Sujet : Re: Lehto: Crazy judge enjoins paper from editorializing
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 01. Mar 2025, 10:04:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpuiip$57gh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Rhino <
no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-02-20 4:28 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
For whatever reason, YouTube won't play this video for me to the end but
you'll get the gist at the beginning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE8LsxPwKIw
For what it's worth, it played all the way to the end for me on my aged
laptop running Windows 10.
I agree with Lehto: it was preposterous to demand the removal of an
editorial just because it criticized the local government. The editor
was simply doing their job and did nothing wrong.
Newspaper eventually prevails.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liP2jUiWggQ
Lehto: Crazy judge enjoins paper from editorializing
Re: Lehto: Crazy judge enjoins paper from editorializing