Sujet : Re: Jewish Journalist Arrested for Objecting to Islamic Terror Symbol in Grocery Store
De : nobody (at) *nospam* nowhere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 07. Mar 2025, 23:12:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqfr1c$3odqf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/7/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 7, 2025 at 12:41:30 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/7/2025 3:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 7, 2025 at 12:04:04 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/6/2025 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>
https://rairfoundation.com/jewish-journalist-sloan-rachmuth-arrested-objecting-islamic-terror/
>
Arrested for 'cyberstalking', not "objecting".
Which is much a bullshit charge as objecting, as was explained in the
original
post**, and why the district attorney immediately shit-canned the case
because
she knew the arrest both failed to meet the elements of the crime charged
and
flagrantly violated the 1st Amendment.
**North Carolina's cyberstalking statute, G.S. 14-196.3, requires repeated
electronic communications made to a person with the intent to "annoy,
threaten, or harass" an individual.
--Rachmuth made a single post (no repetition as the statute requires).
--Rachmuth's post was not directed *at* the employee as the statute
requires.
It was *about* the employee but not sent *to* the employee in any way.
Furthermore, State v. Bishop (2016) and State v. Shackelford (2019) have
reinforced the principle that vague and overly-broad interpretations of
cyber-stalking statutes violate constitutional protections of free speech
and
press freedom.
>
Arresting her for "objecting" would violate her free-speech rights.
Arresting her for cyber-stalking also violated her free speech rights.
Google's AI:
"...cyberstalking is a crime in the United States and many other countries. It's a form of cyberbullying that involves using technology to stalk, harass, or intimidate someone."
Had "objecting" been her offense, she'd have been guilty at the store.
She wasn't guilty of anything regardless of your grammatical nit-picking. What
she did wasn't legally actionable under either North Carolina law or the
United States Constitution.
What "grammatical nitpicking"? Grammar's not involved here.
I have no idea whether she was guilty of cyberstalking or of anything else. I know only that she was arrested for it, and not for "objecting".
Jewish Journalist Arrested for Objecting to Islamic Terror Symbol in Grocery Store
Re: Jewish Journalist Arrested for Objecting to Islamic Terror Symbol in Grocery Store
