Sujet : Re: Libraries won't stand up for First Amendment
De : nobody (at) *nospam* nowhere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 14. Mar 2025, 20:05:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vr1ul7$1srek$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/14/2025 1:50 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-14 12:36 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 3/14/2025 12:15 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
. . .
It's about how miserable life is in the West Bank for Palestinians. I
have no objection to its production. I'm sure it's all full of political
spin and intended to be manipulative. It may even be good propaganda.
Interesting question: Is 'good propaganda' an oxymoron?
Labelling any particular bit of propaganda as good or bad is surely a
moral judgement by the person perceiving it. I wonder if Adam might have
meant "effective" where he said "good"?
Only moviePig could feign misunderstanding of "propaganda". A value
judgement about whether propaganda is good or bad is about
persuassiveness, not morality.
So, what Rhino said. But the other seemed an interesting possibility
Libraries won't stand up for First Amendment
Re: Libraries won't stand up for First Amendment