Re: The First Swedes

On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

 On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

   On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig"

<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

  

   On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

     On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
    

     On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

       On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig"

<nobody@nowhere.com>

 wrote:
      

       On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

         BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
        

         State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget

series called

     HISTORY OF
         SWEDEN.

        

         This is who the government wants its people to

believe were are

   the first
         Swedes:

        

 
 
 
 
 
>

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16

        
         No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
 further and
         further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
         lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
        
         I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.

 
       They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
       lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite

reduced sunlight.

      
       People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia.

They'd already

     evolved
       lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the

time they got

 to the
       high northern latitudes.
      
       The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the

Bromme culture

   post-Ice
       Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and

Iron Ages, were

       overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
   farmers, and
       later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
       tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa.

Genetic studies

     spanning
       2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
 influences from
     the
       eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern

Europe, but zero

     indication
       of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.

 
     Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
     arrived.  And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
     pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
 
     I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and

even less do

     I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal.

Nevertheless,

     afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.

    
     It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
 across the
     globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
 were all
     really black all along.
    
     This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white
culture
     everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just

some genetic

     mistake that needs to be corrected.

 
   I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are

being erased.

  
   I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.

 
 What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?

 
 I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.

 
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'?  Do elaborate...

>
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
>
>