Re: NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra tv 
Sujet : Re: NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 23. Mar 2025, 22:45:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrpvej$38v4s$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

When it's politically convenient, fetuses are children.

NY Times when peddling abortions:

"Fetus"

NY Times when peddling illegal immigration:

"Unborn child"

https://ibb.co/h1gDZqhw

Fine. You win. You've identified a way to end birthright citizenship.
With foetal personhood, one is a citizen of the place of conception.
Now, sex tourism will replace birth tourism.

You're going to have to register each boink with the local vital
statistics registrar in case a child is born.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Mar 25 * NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes5BTR1701
23 Mar 25 +* Re: NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes3moviePig
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes2NoBody
24 Mar 25 i `- Re: NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes1moviePig
23 Mar 25 `- Re: NY Times: Fetuses Are Children, But Only Sometimes1Adam H. Kerman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal