Re: Juicy Smollett 2.0

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:24:35 -0700, anim8rfsk wrote:

moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 3/25/2025 4:32 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:

moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 3/24/2025 5:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

Allentown, Pennsylvania employee LaTarsha Brown charged after placing a
noose at her own desk to stage a hate crime.
>
Jussie Smollett would be proud.
>
About two months ago, Brown reported finding a noose at her desk at City
Hall. Police requested DNA samples of people who were working in the office
at the time of the incident. According to CPT Steve Milkovits, every
employee at the office agreed except for Brown.
>
The Pennsylvania State Police Forensic DNA Division later released a report
revealing that the DNA on the noose matched Brown's DNA.
>
Brown worked for the city´s community and economic development department.
She faces misdemeanor charges including making false reports and
fabricating physical evidence.
>
https://twitter.com/collinrugg/status/1904259828123578748?s=46

>
Either way, seems odd no one else in the office would've touched it.

>
Somebody must´ve touched it in order to tie the noose in the first place.
>
Although finding her DNA on something left on her desk hardly seems
conclusive.
>
She would´ve gotten a harsher punishment for posting a picture of a noose
on Facebook where it will get tossed out.

>
I'll leap to wondering if her prior behavior is figuring in.

>
Facebook has a zero tolerance policy against nooses or the word "hang"
>
I got thrown off for a week for posting the image of the poster for the
Clint Eastwood movie "hang `em high"
>
I suppose it´s possible they had such a policy as well

I'll betcha every one of the "zero tolerance" policies are freely
and fully "violated" and accepted by Facebook Inc., because censorship
decisions are secret and are based on context, like what who says
rather than on what is said. But how could someone casually observe
this, in the opaque honeycombed information fiefdom of facebook?

(not a fan of facebook, or any other political site that prevents
casual visitors to their sites from seeing their posts,
which goes against the spirit of the open Web andfreedom of
speech)