Re: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

Apr 7, 2025 at 8:35:03 PM PDT, shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>:

Tue, 8 Apr 2025 02:33:25 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

After being ordered by a district judge to retrieve Kilmar Armando
Abrego Garcia from the prison in El Salvador to which the Trump
administration deported him, despite a no-deportation order the man had
received during the first Trump administration, the Trump administration
appealed directly to John Roberts.
>
Roberts granted the administration an administrative stay on the basis
of lack of extraterritorial jurisdiction.
>
I don't believe for even a moment that, if requested, the man couldn't
be returned, but Trump wouldn't even ask.
>
He's sure to be killed.
>
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s/

>
At a minimum the administration shouldn't be allowed to send another
person out of the country without due process. There needs to be a
hearing where someone independent can make a determination 1) is this
the person they say it is and 2) is there sufficient cause to deport
them. That process would have (or should have) prevented Garcia from
being deported to that El Salvador prison.

>
You do realize the guys they're going after have already had their hearings
and just ignored their deportation orders, right? Do we need to give them
another hearing about the hearing? And then maybe a third hearing to examine
the first and second hearings?

>
Yeah, 'cuz the Trump administration hasn't made any administrative
orders with regard to who is subject to removal.
>
Oh, wait, they have.
>
In the case of those deported under the 18th century law, the Roberts
court just ruled they get notice and a hearing, even though I doubt
there's any such provision in the law.