Sujet : Re: Why pitch-corrected vocals sound so mechanical
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 14. Apr 2025, 22:04:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vtjt9m$24hjg$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
BTR1701 <
atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Apr 11, 2025 at 1:13:40 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDJF4lR3_eg
On Sunday, Chris Siddall demo'd a new AI system called Cantai that can read
lyrics in a score and sing them during playback. The realism was stunning. Up
till now, you'd enter the lyrics in the score and just have to accept that
while the software can mimic a human voice with reasonable accuracy, it
couldn't actually read and sing the lyrics, so all you'd get would be an "ah"
or "oh" on each note rather than the actual word. Now it can sing the actual
words and do it with not only an amazing degree of accuracy but with actual
musicality. Doesn't sound at all like a computer. Sounds like an actual person
singing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-mTezdPLGI&t=2408s
Great! Swifties can experience a live concert and Taylor Swift won't
have to get out of bed.
Why pitch-corrected vocals sound so mechanical
Re: Why pitch-corrected vocals sound so mechanical
