Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE

On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 4/29/2025 7:35 AM, NoBody wrote:

  On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:46:04 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
  wrote:
 

  On 4/28/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:

>
  Actions always speak louder than words.

>
  And both afford ample opportunity for (mis)interpretation.

    Nothing in her actions can be interpreted as anything other than
  violating the law.

>
...except for failing to honor a bogus warrant.

 Except, as it turns out, it wasn't bogus. It was an administrative warrant,
which is perfectly sufficient for arresting someone in a public place, like a
courthouse. The judge was insisting on a judicial warrant, but that's only
necessary if making entry on private property to effect the arrest against the
consent of the owner.
 So it turns out the judge was wrong, either because she's a state court judge
and doesn't have knowledge and expertise on federal law, or, more likely, she
was just fucking around and delaying things to give the illegal time to
escape.

Ironically, that increases the chance she made an honest mistake.

  So, this whole action was all about taking down a known "activist"...

>
  No, it is about arresting a judge who broke the law by letting an
  accused criminal loose from her court.

>
  Yes.  'Accused' is different from 'convicted', you see...
>

    Which has  NOTHING to do with what I said.

>
What you said is that an *accused* criminal should be locked up.

 No, he didn't. He said an accused criminal should not be helped to escape law
enforcement by a judge who is sworn to uphold the law.

As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's biases.  I.e., he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be.