Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On May 3, 2025 at 8:37:09 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Indeed, that's as may be. But I assume her adjudicators will also take into account (among many other things) her actual state of mind.
On 5/3/2025 9:45 AM, NoBody wrote:And we all have to pay the consequences when we do so and the order turns outOn Fri, 2 May 2025 12:04:55 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>>
wrote:
On 5/2/2025 7:20 AM, NoBody wrote:She had no authority to do so and inserted her personal opinion toOn Thu, 1 May 2025 12:30:49 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>>
wrote:>>
She didn't issue a ruling. She ignored a supposedly invalid warrant.
So...how did make the termination it was invalid if she didn't issue a
ruling?
She consulted her knowledge of the law. We all think we have some.
>
disregard law.
We all have the "authority" to disregard an illegal order.
to be legal after all, especially if we took other affirmative actions to
frustrate the service of that order on a valid defendant.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.