Sujet : Re: [OT] Judge reams out people avoiding jury duty
De : dannyb (at) *nospam* panix.com (danny burstein)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 21. May 2025, 03:29:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <100jdr5$mhq$1@reader1.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : nn/6.7.3
In <
100jdfb$2krk5$1@dont-email.me> "Adam H. Kerman" <
ahk@chinet.com> writes:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
When I finally returned home, I found a long-expired summons for jury duty in
my accumulated mail. I called the number on the summons and explained what had
happened. The woman looked up the number on my summons and said it was no
problem, they'd just cancel it in the system and issue a new summons for me
since I was home now and being retired had no work conflicts with serving. And
a few days later, a new summons showed up. I went and got eliminated the
moment both sides discovered I was a lawyer.
Wouldn't stating that you intend to apply common sense after listening
to arguments have disqualified you as well?
"I'm a firm beliver in Jury Nullification"
-- _____________________________________________________Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
[OT] Judge reams out people avoiding jury duty
Re: [OT] Judge reams out people avoiding jury duty