Re: Nazi White Supremacist Trump Seizes On Videos Of A Fringe South African Politician As Evidence Of Threats To White Farmers

On 2025-05-23 18:34:51 +0000, moviePig said:
 

On 5/23/2025 12:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On May 23, 2025 at 12:19:07 AM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:
>

On 2025-05-23 02:09:09 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>

On May 22, 2025 at 3:59:12 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:
>

On 2025-05-22 17:12:13 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>

On May 22, 2025 at 9:00:45 AM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:
>

In article <100ncn3$3gior$2@dont-email.me>,
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

>
Foolish old Orange Grandpa playing "fake news" while churlishly chastising
an experienced reporter. An international embarassment, every fscking day.

>
No world leader is going to want to meet with him (with the exception of
autocracies like the one he's hellbent to turn the US into). They don't
want to be a pawn in his messaging to his base. Also they have their own
constituents back home to consider.
>
Maybe him and Vance and Rubio can sit around in the Oval Office alone
and lament the tragedy of American democracy.

>
Despite your inaccurate description of the U.S. as a democracy,

>
<roll eyes> One of those "America is a republic not a democracy" freaks.

>
<burps> Yeah, one of those "let's call things what they actually are"
freaks.
>
The U.S. is much more preferable than a democracy. Democracy as a form of
government is only slightly better than a dictatorship. Reduced down to its
essentials democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
The sheep isn't gonna like the result of that election even though it was
arrived at democratically.
>

last I checked, we're still having elections and the current crew are there
because
they were voted in 'democratically'. I see no evidence that 'democracy' has
disappeared.

>
The US is now classified as a "deficient democracy," number 36 in a
ranking of 176 countries.

>
Classified by whom? What are their credentials? What are their biases? Why
is
their opinion supposed to be considered fact?

>
See for yourself. And do your own research, I'm not Google.
>
https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking

>
Well, if a bunch of leftist academics at Universitat Wurzburg say so, it must
be true.

>
How are they "leftist"?

 They're serious and scholarly so obviously they can't be rightists.