Re: Tulsi Gabbard Placed on Terror Watch List After Criticizing Biden/Harris Admin

On 8/13/24 3:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v9gdqn$1vj8$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
 

On 8/13/2024 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v9gann$13f2$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>

On 8/13/2024 1:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v9fve4$3uvrs$1@dont-email.me>,
    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 8/12/2024 11:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Aug 12, 2024 at 8:31:13 PM PDT, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
>

On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:13:23 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>

In article <585lbj5ghnhj1t62oklmqr48n6dktajqfm@4ax.com>,
     shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>

     On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:55:57 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
     wrote:
          >In article <v9dv7t$3fq89$1@dont-email.me>,
     > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
     >
     >> On 8/12/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
     >

Immediately after going on national TV and criticizing the
Biden/Harris administration, former Congresswoman Tulsi
Gabbard was placed on TSA's Quiet Skies terror watchlist, which
subjects her to FAM surveillance, bomb dog screening, and
aggressive pat downs and luggage screening every time she boards
a flight.
>
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RJBygvtNfSY&pp=ygUaTWF0dCB0YWliYm
k6IHR1bHNpIGdhYmJhcmQ%3D
>

Did you watch your own video? The outrage here (if there is one)
is that such a hidden haphazard watchlist exists, and not that
Gabbard would somehow get placed on it.

>
There can be more than one outrage.
>

Ted Kennedy was on such a list.

>
He was accidentally placed on it because he had a common name. How
many other Tulsi Gabbards are out there, do you suppose, that
could make the same excuse here even remotely credible?
>
And Kennedy's list was one for actual suspected terrorists and so
had some basic justification for its existence. Quiet Skies is
apparently for anyone the government merely deems problematic.

     And it looks like it was created during the Trump administration.

>
Then he should have to answer for it. As should Biden/Harris (they're
one and the same these days) for Gabbard's placement on it. Or any of
the people from Jan. 6 who are on it merely because they attended
Trump's speech on the Ellipse that day and never went near the
Capitol.
That's actually an impeachable-level offense as far as I'm concerned.

>
Wouldn't that depend upon who made the decision to add her to the
list. It's one thing if the President was to have made the decision
but what if it was someone in the TSA that decided to add those names
to the list.

>
Has the president fired that person? If not, we can assume he endorses
that decision and he should therefore be impeached.

>
Nonsense. If the President fired that person, "we" would assume he's
merely trying to hide his endorsement and should therefore be impeached.

>
As usual, I have no idea what you're talking about.

>
You're pretending that there's some action the President could take that
would pry you from your latest conspiracy theory.

>
Ah, so you're pretending to read my mind again. Gotcha.

>
No reading necessary.  It screams aloud.

 Nope. I never said the things you claim, so you must be doing another of
your Kreskin acts. On the other hand, Kreskin actually gave the correct
answers, so I don't know if that's really the best comparison for
whatever it is you're pretending to do.

So mpig was incorrect?  As usual, instead of clearly stating that, you danced around it in a dainty, drag queen fashion.