Re: [OT] Did you know that blacks built Stonehenge?

On 5/25/2025 5:48 PM, Rhino wrote:

On 2025-05-25 5:38 PM, moviePig wrote:

On 5/25/2025 5:24 PM, Rhino wrote:

On 2025-05-25 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:

  On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"
  <no_offline_contact@example.com>
  wrote:
>

  Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
  Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
  blacks built Stonehenge.
>
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]

>
  I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
  'decolonize' academic curriculum.
>
  Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
  understand if
  they were protesting in India or some African country that was
  colonized by
  Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies.
  But how
  do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first
  place. It's a logical oxymoron.
>
  And how do they claim at the same time that:
>
  (1) Historical Britons were black, and
>
  (2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
>
  If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people?
  They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the
wealth of
  Africa.
>

  Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- out lies.
  As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are
  NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing
  it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There
  will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact
  forever more.

>
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.

>
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
>
>

Not in moviePig's world. On that planet, anything anyone says is at least possibly true and, apparently, nothing can be disproved because any evidence you can produce is always disputable.

>
Whereas, in Rhino World, "facts" are decided by 'plain common sense'?
>
>

A world view based on common sense is a hell of a lot better than the absurdist world you create when you base everything on wishful thinking.
 We've seen that all around us for the last decade or two as men decided that they were women - or cats or spirit creatures - just because they wanted to be and our legislators enshrined that in law with criminal penalties for disputing the claims of these fantasists.

But you're not talking about a *personal* world view, you're writing legislation.  In your example, you're drawing a clear line between males and females ...though Nature herself doesn't.  Moreover, you're doing it with animosity, to punish some people who are already quite fucked up.