Sujet : Re: [OT] CBC says 9/11 was *not* a terrorist attack
De : nobody (at) *nospam* nowhere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 27. Aug 2026, 18:19:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <116prja$1lqak$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/27/2026 12:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Aug 27, 2026 at 6:49:41 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Our "beloved" state broadcaster, the CBC, apparently anticipating
imminent stories on the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, has
instructed its journalists to NOT refer to those attacks as acts of
terrorism. The guy whose in charge of such things has told them to refer
to these events as plane hijackings.
As ridiculous as that is, aren't plane hijacking by definition terrorism?
No. E.g., 'plane hijacking' was once a means of getting to Cuba.
If 9-11 doesn't qualify as terrorism, what does?
The host here is Ben Mulroney, whose father was Prime Minister Brian
Mulroney.
>
Unfortunately, no one has chosen to even ask questions about the
background of the individual at CBC who gave this directive. His name
sounds rather Arab to me, making me wonder if we're letting the Muslim
Brotherhood or ISIS directly appoint the leaders in the CBC now.
Remember, this is the same CBC who imitates the BBC by refusing to call
Hamas a terrorist organization; they are merely "militants".
>
It's incredible that the CBC apparently wants us to believe that 9/11
was merely a group of plane hijackings that had an unexpected side
effect of putting three jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon (and
one in a Pennsylvania field)!
>
The panel is right in this case: the CBC's news organization needs an
enema to get rid of the people making these decisions, although
privatizing it altogether would be even better.
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal