Re: Bicycle infrastucture

On Fri, 17 May 2024 19:01:25 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 17 May 2024 19:39:42 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
(chomp)

Yes and I was wrong. There are others without specific
location which leads me to think you're right.  Then again
the actual examples from the real world are extreme in
themselves, i.e., need no exaggeration!

>
I beg to differ.  Exaggeration, PhotoShopping and "improving" photos
are very important.  Adding or changing something in a photo, below
the minimum level of perception, that isn't quite right, is a really
good way to inspire the reader to maintain eye contact with the photo
or whatever surrounds the photo.  If the photo was normal and not
retouched, then the reader would glance over it and not give it a
second thought.  However, if there was something wrong, unusual, out
of place or suspicious, the reader will likely maintain eye contact
with the photo for a much longer period.  It's all part of subliminal
advertising. 

Here's a typical photo designed to hold your attention.  See if you
can find what was changed to make readers linger:
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/worth1000-bikes.jpg>



--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558