Sujet : Re: cyclists attack auto driver
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 16. Aug 2024, 20:59:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <0ibvbjtnogf47avmn1v8rj5sf94g9corum@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:35:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<
frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 8/16/2024 7:57 AM, John B. wrote:
Yup. A bloke that has an auto car AND a motorcycle defiantly needs a
bicycle... Doesn't he?
And our resident fool shoots himself in then foot once again.
>
I suspect your "logic" is an attempt to insult most members of this
group. I suspect almost everyone owns at least one other vehicle besides
their bicycle. And I suspect most own more than one bike.
Nonsense. I doubt that anybody in this group needs a bike.
But again: Bicycling provides net benefit for society. Gun fetishes
deliver net detriment. These points are demonstrable using data. Don't
let your gun fetish lead you to denigrate those who are doing society good.
Krygowski has yet to comprehend the simple fact that benefits and
detriments are subjective. He'd like to make that judgment for
everyone, but the data proves him wrong. More people have chosen to
own guns than have chosen bicycles.