Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Fri, 23 May 2025 07:56:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:I disagree. Fundamentals of logic and argument, exercises in criticism with examples and then switching sides in argument are very good at teaching how to think.
On 5/23/2025 5:45 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:I don't believe you can teach anyone how to think. I believe how muchOn Fri, 23 May 2025 10:40:08 +0200, Rolf Mantel>
<news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
>Am 22.05.2025 um 02:16 schrieb Catrike Ryder:>On Wed, 21 May 2025 19:08:44 -0400, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 5/21/2025 3:12 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>On Wed, 21 May 2025 13:33:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:>>
(How _does_ a person become a mature adult without having learned
anything about Stoicism? That's just astonishing.)
Actually I know it well, in fact I pretty much live it, but I never
heard the term Stoicism.
Wow.
Where would someone with a real life come across the term stoicism?
Maybe in some group think session in a classroom. How would knowing
that term be of value to that someone?
In some countries, cultural education like this is part of the high
school curriculum.
Indeed, that would be a group thinking session about group thinking.
Not altogether different than what happens in churches.
>
--
C'est bon
Soloman
Perhaps but perhaps not.
>
There's a difference between how to think and what to think.
The education racket has fallen from the former to the
latter but that is not inherent.
one does it, vs relying on input from external sources is an intrinsic
characteristic.
--
C'est bon
Soloman
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.