Re: Riding a bike a protection and in general

On 6/19/2025 11:14 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 6/19/2025 7:44 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 07:37:47 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:55:51 -0400, floriduh dumbass
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:30:13 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 6/17/2025 9:08 PM, John B. wrote:

>
But this has NO relationship to his unspoken conclusion that a gun in
the house results in homicides.

>
hey, stupid....it isn't unspoken, it's explicitly stated there there's a
direct relationship between a gun in the home and an increase in
homicide. Are you taking kunich lessons in dumbassery again?

>
>
I'm pretty sure that there many far owners of guns who have not been
shot than those who have. According to Junior's and Krygowski's
"logic" that would indicate that owning a gun makes you less likely to
be shot.

>
>

No, dumbass, that's your perverted "logic".

>
Much like what Krygowki did, Junior can only reply with a "no it's
not," and without any explanation as to why it's not.

The data has been presented to you a dozen times. At this point you deserve little more attention than "shut the fuck up, asshole"

>
I stand by my claim that it's the same stupd logic Krygowski used to
argue that guns in your home makes it more likely you'll be shot.

That's because you're a willfully ignorant dumbass who refuses to read or consider information that runs counter to your magatard echo chamber, and even if you do, you express a conclusion completely contradictory to the stated information (as you've done repeatedly in this forum, mr. "the AR-15 was a weapon the military never wanted and never used").
You're simply not smart enough to have a lucid and/or rational conversation with.