Re: 8 & 9 year old girls riding bicycles

On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 05:22:53 -0500, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 12/26/2024 11:49 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:06:09 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
 

On 12/25/2024 8:31 PM, AMuzi wrote:

>
In urban areas, which vary greatly in everything, the more violent
neighborhoods are where citizens are much more likely to arm themselves.
And prudently so.

>
Again, the research I cited deliberately accounted for that.
>
In order to cling to your argument, you keep pretending the research
didn't take neighborhood characteristics into account, and didn't
examine homes with and without guns in the same neighborhoods.
>
In order to cling to his argument, the guy who rides a tricycle keeps
pretending the research involves only a few shootings.
>
Neither of those pretenses are honest.

 
<chuckle> None of Krygowski's cites showed evidence that anyone died
of even got shot for no other reason than that there was a gun in the
house. IOW, they dishonestly and ignorantly claimed that simple
correlation implied causation, ignoring any other extenuating
conditions. Krygowski, of course, nodded his approval of the
fallacious nonsense.
 
Some people think and do what they're told to think and do by people
they have chosen to tell them what to think and do. The anti-assault
rifle loonies are examples of that.

>
moreso are the willfully ignorant who insist that having a gun in the
home doesn't increase the likelyhood of getting shot with that gun.
>

 
 
--
C'est bon
Soloman

Given that it is quite impossible to be shot with a gun in your home
without having a gun in your home, I doubt I ever insisted otherwise.

--
C'est bon
Soloman