Re: guns again.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:15:51 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
wrote:

John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:22:46 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:12:10 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
 
 

I've repeatedly asked for examples of practical use of ARs.
 

 
Krygowski is the one that wants others to accept his opinions. I
couldn't care less what he wants and have no interest in changing his
mind.  I want AR15s to be legal and the fact that AR15s are legal and
that such is not likely to change anytime soon means that I have no
need to defend my opinion.

 
One might also question whether a bicycle is  practical...to one that
owns an automobile AND a motorcycle?
 

Can’t I own a motorcycle though their usefulness is fairly limited, about
the only ones I see are the blood transport guys.
>
Everything else is van or bike.
>
Ie a motorbike can’t either filter or go through the traffic filters that a
bike can as so on.
>
Are bike largely leisure absolutely, though certainly in london large
numbers (1 million +) do use bikes to get around London.
>
Turning the argument around somewhat number of folks in london, car utility
is limited and largely what folks are used to that being the best choice.
>
Roger Merriman

I think you miss the point.

If one has an auto and a motorcycle does he actually require a third
transportation  device?  After all,millions of people,world wide, get
by with only one :-)

And don't forget one's feet :-) When I was and  in school I walked a
mile (1.6 KM) to school each morning and another mile  home in the
evening.
 
--
Cheers,

John B.