Sujet : Re: A Bicycle Safety Parable
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 21. Jul 2024, 16:56:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <89bq9j9dtp08mamhg5ng28v6i90ujrn0e1@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 10:20:26 -0500, AMuzi <
am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 7/21/2024 3:19 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:11:58 +0200, Wolfgang Strobl
<news5@mystrobl.de> wrote:
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:46:53 -0400 schrieb Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org>:
>
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 13:19:02 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
On 7/20/2024 1:08 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
https://bicycledriving.com/law/a-bicycle-safety-parable
>
>
>
+1
I fought those fights against The Planners all my life. And
lost every time.
>
>
For what it's worth. I am opposed to any "bikeway" that is not
totally isolated from vehicular traffic and parked cars (bike lanes).
>
That is completely missing the point.
I thought one of the points was about disliking bike lanes.
>
I'm with Mr Strobl.
>
Dedicated (non-MV) recreational paths are different in kind
from cyclist-eating traffic impediments, 'death chutes' and
so on.
You missed my point. I also think bike lanes on streets and roads are
terrible, no matter what color they're painted.
…