Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 7/3/2024 2:09 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:On 7/3/2024 10:45 AM, AMuzi wrote:>On 7/3/2024 8:49 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:On 7/3/2024 8:36 AM, AMuzi wrote:>On 7/2/2024 10:06 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>>>
What would be pertinent would be innumerable reports of
old folks in Florida going for a walk in their
residential neighborhoods in Florida and having to
shoot... well, whoever Mr. Tricycle fantasizes would
attack him.
>
Got a bunch of citations like that?
>
It's, just as cycling in traffic, a personal evaluation
of risk and extremely situational besides personal.
Of course it's situational and personal.
>
It was because of the "situational" part that I asked
about defensive use of guns required by old guys walking
around their residential neighborhoods at 4 AM. My bet
that it's zero in our tricycle rider's area.
>
But condoning behavior because it's "personal" opens up
approval to a world of weirdness.
>
It might be fun to think of examples; for example, what
if a guy was afraid to ever leave his house because he
was afraid a spider might bite him outdoors?
>
It would be legal. It would be personal. It would still
be illogical and paranoid.
>
- Frank Krygowski
>
You don't know what you don't know.
>
https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/article/lost-coast-trail-hiker-19545918.php
Among other things, I don't know how a hiking accident in
California is pertinent to a discussion about taking a
neighborhood walk in a Florida suburb.
Well yes, assaulted with a bladed weapon and thrown off a
cliff is highly unlikely on a Florida wilderness bicycle
path. No cliffs.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.