Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:09:42 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 7/3/2024 10:45 AM, AMuzi wrote:>On 7/3/2024 8:49 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>On 7/3/2024 8:36 AM, AMuzi wrote:On 7/2/2024 10:06 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>>>
What would be pertinent would be innumerable reports of old folks in
Florida going for a walk in their residential neighborhoods in
Florida and having to shoot... well, whoever Mr. Tricycle fantasizes
would attack him.
>
Got a bunch of citations like that?
>
It's, just as cycling in traffic, a personal evaluation of risk and
extremely situational besides personal.
Of course it's situational and personal.
>
It was because of the "situational" part that I asked about defensive
use of guns required by old guys walking around their residential
neighborhoods at 4 AM. My bet that it's zero in our tricycle rider's
area.
>
But condoning behavior because it's "personal" opens up approval to a
world of weirdness.
>
It might be fun to think of examples; for example, what if a guy was
afraid to ever leave his house because he was afraid a spider might
bite him outdoors?
>
It would be legal. It would be personal. It would still be illogical
and paranoid.
>
- Frank Krygowski
>
You don't know what you don't know.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/article/lost-coast-trail-hiker-19545918.php
Among other things, I don't know how a hiking accident in California is
pertinent to a discussion about taking a neighborhood walk in a Florida
suburb.
<LOL> , Krygowski says, "look here, I'll decide what other people
should talk about."
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.