Re: Todays rant

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Todays rant
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 06. Dec 2024, 04:12:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <a5p4lj9psg4aiq1nq1u73feiacav8favh8@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Thu, 05 Dec 2024 16:35:48 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Dec 2024 22:52:54 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
10% of those that were given the mRNA vaccine that died within 14 days were NOT considered "vaccinated" and so they didn't mark those deaths as "vaccine related".
>
Got any evidence of such a fatality rate?  I'm patient.  I'll wait.  I
especially want to hear about the 14 day time limit.
>
Incidentally, during the height of the epidemic, a 14 day delay in
obtaining a coroners report.
>
Such a high percentage of those given the Astrozinica vaccines had very serious side effects that they withdrew it from production.

Here we had free vaccinations and a large percentage of the 200,000
town population got them. When someone here started saying that the
shots would kill you I asked a doctor if she knew of any deaths that
had been attributed to the vaccination and she said "none that we know
about"

Re effectiveness of the shots I can only say that the number Covid
cases here was 68,000/1 million population while the U.S. was 333,985
per 1M pop.
How ever that is little misleading as here the reaction was rather
stringent rules, masks,etc, while I gather in the U.S. there was
somewhat limited remedial actions taken.

Baloney.  It was withdrawn because there was a surplus of later and
better vaccines which handle more variant.
>
(May 8, 2024)
<https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-vaccine/>
"AstraZeneca has begun the global withdrawal of its Covid-19 vaccine,
Vaxzevria, citing a surplus of updated vaccines designed to combat new
virus variants."
>
By side effects, are you referring to the Vaers database?  It's not
intended to be used for determining causality:
<https://vaers.hhs.gov>
>
As I previously asked you, which you ignored, do you have a vision
problem?  If not, do you have a reading comprehension problem? Perhaps
a fear of looking things up on the internet that might prove that
you're wrong?
>
Score:  Two claims, both wrong.
--
Cheers,

John B.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal