Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:55:18 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 21:25:50 -0400, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 7/10/2024 7:33 PM, John B. wrote:>>
But, but, but... as I and others have written there are millions of AR
type firearms in the U.S. and how many are used to in mass shootings.?
Turn the question around. How many are used for anything legitimate and
practical?
The vast majority of them, of course.
>Very close to zero.>
Why nonsense. Only a small percentage of them are *not* used for a
legitimate and practical purpose.
>
>A very few are used for hunting, despite>
being far from optimum.
As if you'd know what was optimum?
>And how many large scale mass shootings have been done with them? Since
the AR became popular, most killings of a dozen or more innocents have
been with those guns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States
I had a look at Frankie's reference and even counted noses and
disregarding cases where multiple types of fire arms were used the
score (1 dozen or more) is ... Pistols - 122, Semi auto rifle - 118
Apparently in Frankie's world 18 is larger then 22 :-)
>
>>So that's the detriment. What are the benefits? And how can you, John,
live without the purported benefits?You don't own one because you know you don't need one. You argue in>favor of them only because you're in love with guns.
Nope. As above I'm simply arguing against someone that posts false
information :-)
>
>Many people argue for them for same reason people would argue for your
right to own an electric car, even though they have no intention of
buying one themselves.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.