On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 20:29:23 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<
frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 12/5/2024 6:07 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
I remember someone who insists that the fact that people who have guns
sometimes get shot mean that having a gun makes you more likely to get
shot.
You're not remembering. You're imagining straw man positions. Just like
Tom, you imagine arguments in which you're "winning."
>
I've given multiple citations of reputable sources, and many links to
reputable studies. You've given only snarks, which is one of the reasons
I so seldom respond to you.
>
You've got the intellectual depth of a whiny third grader.
I remember it well. You went on and on insisting that the correlation
between gun shot victims and gun owning victims meant owning a gun was
dangerous. Apparently, you now understand how wrong that was, but
you're too cowardly to admit it, so, above, you cowardly lie about
having done it.
As for your citations of reputable sources, the thing is; you saying
they're reputable doesn't make them reputable. Years ago, ABC, NBC,
and CBS were considered reputable. They're not reputable today.
They're in bed with one political party.
Politicians lie. News media lies. University officials and teaching
staff lie.
As for your "reputable studies," see the one posted in this thread
about pesticides in our food. It was funded by a group promoting their
"organic" food.
You recently posted a nonsense "study" claiming that more Republicans
than Democrats died of Covid, and you were too intellectually shallow
to wonder about what other factors the subjects of the study might
have been involved with.
It costs money to do "studies, and people don't pay for them without
expecting to get something out of it. You're so intellectually shallow
that you believe anything that goes along with your opinions.
..and as for your intellectual depth, how intellectually deep is it
for you to continue to argue on and on for several weeks with the same
tired arguments (AR15s) that weren't convincing anyone?
How intellectually deep is it for you to cowardly snip what I posted
and respond with some nonsense about how quickly I responded to your
post.
How intellectually deep is it for you to habitually lie, brag, make up
and post anecdotes? You're so intellectually shallow that you
apparently believe that posting that some unknown person thinks highly
of you is documentation. Below is something that nobody with an
intellect beyond 8 years old would say.
"there are others who have examined my
bicycling qualifications, tested me and proclaimed that I do, indeed,
know what I'm talking about regarding bicycling.
--Frank Krygowski
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/phkWDoYngY0/m/sSpJLrQKvKQJI suspect that you say similar things to yourself all the time.
-- C'est bonSoloman
…