Re: Disc's without power

On Sat, 03 May 2025 21:30:41 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

It is clear that you know how to pontificate. Just the idea that you have to go out of your way to define "potificate" as if no one knew the definition proves that you are pontificating.

I didn't provide the definition for the other readers because they
know how to search for definitions on the Internet.  I provided the
definition first for myself, because I wasn't quite sure of the exact
definition, and secondly for you, because I was fairly sure you didn't
know the definition and would not look it up.

Not to mention your inability to understand typos.

Why do you consider my inability to decode your typos a good thing?  I
shouldn't need to know such things if you would bother to use a
spelling checker.  I can decode most of your sloppy typing and inept
spelling.  I just don't consider it worth the effort.

You don't have to be intellectually gifted like Flunky to know that T and R are next to each other on the keyboard or that x and c are also.

It took me quite a while to determine the mechanism behind your sloppy
typing.  I went much further than just determining that your mistakes
were from hitting adjacent keys.  At this time, I can probably
determine which of your fingers are giving you trouble.

I have written scientific studies and reports.

Google scholar doesn't find any papers written by you:
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22thomas%20kunich%22>
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22tom%20kunich%22>
Of course, this is not definitive because absence of evidence isn't
necessarily evidence of absence. 

What have you done?

Nothing you would consider important.  However, I do have a question.
Why do you want to make yourself appear important because you might
have published some papers and why do you expect me to follow in your
example?  I have no reason to need general acclaim, but you seem to
crave it.

If I don't have time or my cat is sitting in the way, if you don't like the mistakes don't read them.

I don't believe you have a cat.  No specific reason except I don't
think any cat would tolerate you for very long.  Cats choose their
owners, not the other way around.

But you and Krygowski read them specifically for typos instead of content so that you can snivel about them.

I can't speak for Frank, but that's fairly close to why I read
rec.bicycles.tech.  You've asked me several times why I'm here.  My
purpose is to demonstrate your mistakes and to ruin what's left of
your credibility and reputation rec.bicycles.tech.

I did another 25 mile ride on a bike worth $4,000 this morning.

Amazing.  Did you really have your bicycle appraised before today's
ride?  Which of your bicycles is worth $4,000?

When was the last time you had any bicycle content in your postings to a bicycle group?

Along with a lox, bagel and onion sandwich, I had some bicycle content
this afternoon for lunch.  I suspect that this is not the answer you
were expecting.  If you rephrase your question in a less ambiguous
manner, I might be able to answer it.

I feel very sad for you but you have brought your entire life onto yourself.

How does one bring my entire life onto myself?  I have no idea what
you're talking about and neither do you.


--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558