Sujet : Re: Excuses, excuses
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 10. Apr 2024, 22:38:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <istd1jp4up4cb94tlickucid41m34299gf@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:26:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<
frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 4/10/2024 2:54 AM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:18:54 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:51:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
Last I checked, there were
still over ten million miles bicycled between fatalities, and cycling
was much safer per mile than walking.
>
>
<LOL> Safer per mile is a ridiculously stupid statistic. I'll wager
that cycling is much safer *per mile* than mountain climbing, too.
>
But it justifies his arguments so perfectly.
But evening things up perhaps hour of use would be more accurate.
>
It always puzzles me that some avid cyclists are SO determined to
pretend that simply riding a bike is terribly dangerous! Why would that be?
I never met anyone like that. Must be some of Krygowski's cycle club.
Snip
And let's recall that in at least five studies, bicycling has been found
to be safer than _not_ bicycling.
Krygowski demonstrates his inability to understand logic by posting
ridiculously illogical statistics. It all depends on what a person
does when they're not_ bicycling.