Re: cyclists attack auto driver

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: cyclists attack auto driver
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 20. Aug 2024, 11:04:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <jak8cjhtigf2grhab4mdi5jj1cn6sgl62p@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:13:16 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 8/19/2024 12:19 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
 
<chuckle> I've yet to see any of your "accomplishments"I'd have any
interest in doing that I haven't already done.
>
You've seen some evidence, posted by others, of a few of my
accomplishments. Saying you'd have no interest in them is a cheap
argument, like bragging "I would have won that race, but I didn't want to."
>
To mention _just_ the few of my accomplishments that have already been
linked to here by others:
>
You'd have no chance of becoming a licensed Professional Engineer, nor
doing the education, professional work, and passing the exhaustive
testing needed to get that license. Pretending disinterest is irrelevant.

Anybody can get an education. It's a tool, not an accomplishment. Many
people actually do something with what they learn, instead of just
bragging about it.

You'd have no chance of being recruited to teach at a university,

Knowing you, I doubt you were recruited.
 
let
alone be promoted to Full Professor,

That's simply a function of time.

because you'd lack the required
credentials, you'd lack the knowledge, you'd lack the communication
skills, and you'd be scared shitless to stand in front of a classroom
and talk.

<chuckle> As if standing in front of a bunch of kids takes courage. On
the other hand, standing in front of several top heads of corporations
and state utility commissioners explaining computer software that
you'd written might have take a bit.

You'd have no chance of serving on a public Board of Trustees for
decades. Nobody would ask you to, because you'd lack relevant skills and
knowledge, and you'd be too afraid to interact with other Board members
at meetings.

<eyeroll> Knowing you, you probably begged to put on that board
because you craved the attention and notoriety. I never needed to do
that.

You'd never be interviewed on transportational bicycling because you're
afraid to ride on normal roads, and your posts here demonstrate massive
ignorance of best practices.

Good grief, you actually think being interviewed is an accomplishment.
I suppose, that somebody like you with low self esteem would see it
that way.

Again, those few examples of what I've done are just the ones others
have searched out and linked to, in their stalking efforts. Your only
"accomplishment" is (allegedly) writing some novels that don't qualify
as even "dime store novels" because they've never sold even in dime
stores, let alone elsewhere.

That's from a guy who wrote about his bragging to his imaginary
friend.

Your list of "accomplishments" is, as I expected, very small. You
spent your working life in a highly protected, non-competitive,
non-challenging profession talking to young people who couldn't talk
back, and you went around soliciting situations and occasions where
you could try to boost your self esteem.

Oh, yes, you also rode your bicycle.

You've done nothing. Your jealousy is driving you crazy.

<LOL> Apparently, judging from what you wrote above, it's you that's
done nothing. Have you ever tried something a little more exciting and
challenging than riding a bicycle?

Your life is a study in abject boredom.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Aug 24 * cyclists attack auto driver569AMuzi
13 Aug 24 +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver567John B.
13 Aug 24 i+* Re: cyclists attack auto driver565Frank Krygowski
13 Aug 24 ii`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver564Catrike Ryder
13 Aug 24 ii `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver563Frank Krygowski
13 Aug 24 ii  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver562Catrike Ryder
14 Aug 24 ii   +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5John B.
15 Aug 24 ii   i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4zen cycle
15 Aug 24 ii   i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii   i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii   i   `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Zen Cycle
14 Aug 24 ii   `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver556Frank Krygowski
14 Aug 24 ii    `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver555Catrike Ryder
14 Aug 24 ii     +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver553John B.
14 Aug 24 ii     i+- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1John B.
14 Aug 24 ii     i+- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Catrike Ryder
14 Aug 24 ii     i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver550Frank Krygowski
14 Aug 24 ii     i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver549Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver17Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver16Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver8John B.
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i i+* Re: cyclists attack auto driver6Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i ii`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i ii `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i ii  +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Catrike Ryder
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i ii  i`- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Zen Cycle
6 Sep 24 ii     i  i ii  `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i i`- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Catrike Ryder
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i i  `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3John B.
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i  +- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i  `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii     i  +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver528John B.
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver527Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver526Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver525AMuzi
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver521Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i+* Re: cyclists attack auto driver10AMuzi
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver9Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver8Jeff Liebermann
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver7AMuzi
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii   +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4Jeff Liebermann
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii   i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3AMuzi
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii   i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Jeff Liebermann
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii   i  `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Eric Pozharski
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii   `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Radey Shouman
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   ii    `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1AMuzi
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver510Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver451Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver450Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver429AMuzi
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i i+- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Frank Krygowski
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i i+* Re: cyclists attack auto driver426John B.
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i ii+* Re: cyclists attack auto driver423Frank Krygowski
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver422Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii +- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver420Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver13AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver12Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver6Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5zen cycle
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3zen cycle
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i   `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i    `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1zen cycle
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5AMuzi
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i  +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Frank Krygowski
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i  i`- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1AMuzi
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2John B.
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i   `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver172AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i+* Re: cyclists attack auto driver21Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver20AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver6Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3AMuzi
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i   `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i    `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Catrike Ryder
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver6zen cycle
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5AMuzi
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver4zen cycle
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3AMuzi
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i   +- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1zen cycle
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii i   `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Frank Krygowski
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver7Frank Krygowski
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver6AMuzi
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii   +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2AMuzi
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii   i`- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Catrike Ryder
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii   `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3Frank Krygowski
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii    `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2AMuzi
19 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  ii     `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i+- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1John B.
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver149John B.
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i +- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1John B.
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver8zen cycle
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver7John B.
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i +- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1zen cycle
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver5Frank Krygowski
18 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver139Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i iii  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver234Catrike Ryder
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i ii`* Re: cyclists attack auto driver2Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i i`- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1John B.
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver20Catrike Ryder
15 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i +* Re: cyclists attack auto driver51AMuzi
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   i `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver7Radey Shouman
16 Aug 24 ii     i  i   `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3John B.
15 Aug 24 ii     i  `* Re: cyclists attack auto driver3Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii     `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Zen Cycle
13 Aug 24 i`- Re: cyclists attack auto driver1Catrike Ryder
28 Aug 24 `- Re: cyclists attack auto driver UPDATE1AMuzi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal