Re: Some bicycle paths...

On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:19:15 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 7/26/2024 3:09 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 7/26/2024 1:49 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 7/26/2024 9:14 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 7/25/2024 9:57 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 7/25/2024 3:27 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 7/25/2024 1:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

>
Purposely irritating others is fun to people who are childish and
obnoxious.
>

>
And yet, autos with political candidate stickers are common.

>
Interesting viewpoint. So expressing approval for a candidate in an
election is childish and obnoxious? Really?
>
I see many more right wing examples than left wing examples. And
when it comes to obscene examples, it's not even close.
>
>

>
"> I see many more right wing examples"
>
>
That's because you take offense at them and blithely disregard the
left wing stickers. Perfectly normal response BTW, nothing wrong with
that but see it as it is.

>
I know what confirmation bias is, thank you. I suppose this fine side
point could be settled by actual counts. You know, data.
>
But the fundamental point is that candidate stickers are not
necessarily intended to irritate others, as you implied. Most are
intended to express support for a candidate, just as similar ones
saying "Vote for the [police, or fire, school or library] levy."
>
And they've been ruled a first amendment right.
>

 
Excellent analysis.
Now just extend your argument one Amendment further...

>
ok. how about SCOTUS has repeated ruled the right to free speech is not
absolute. Let's extend that to the 2nd amendment.

Already has been, Dummy, although there's often political based
inhibitions to execute the laws, as with the Hunter Biden case. Anyone
else lying on the federal background check would have been arrested
and tried iimmediately, and rightly so.