Re: Tom's demons are strong today! Re: RE: Re: Higher Education Is Overrated

On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:38:22 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:56:21 -0600, AMuzi wrote:
>

On 12/14/2024 1:12 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:10:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
 

On 12/8/2024 7:35 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 22:46:45 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

Tell us Liebermann, why did you spend 6 years in college to get a 4
year degree? You told us it was to get antidraft status.

>
Close.  It was to obtain a draft deferment.  There's no such thing as
"antidraft" unless you're referring to someone opposed to the draft.
There were some other reasons why it took so long, but the deferment
was the major motivation.  For example, I had a part time job for all
of the first 5 years and worked full time during two summers.  There
was also a problem getting into classes required for graduation.  The
colleges were overflowing with students doing the same thing.
Seniors had priority for obtaining seats.  I had to take some
unrelated classes (i.e. tractor driving and tractor mechanics) in
order to have enough units to obtain a deferment and later try to
catch up when seats in my major became available.  At one point, I
was drafted and went as far as getting a pre-induction physical, but
was able to convince the draft board that I should be allowed to stay
in school.
>

So after all that time in school you learned nothing at all

>
Who are you to judge what I've learned?  You didn't graduate from
high school and therefore didn't have any college experience.  By
your own criteria, you're not qualified to judge anything with which
you haven't personally experienced.
>

and exited it with nothing more than the analog radio knowledge you
had before going to college from your interesst in citizen's band
radios.

>
Nice word salad.  Impressing sounding terms, but nothing
intelligible.
>

Bend over in front of Flunky and say "Please".

>
You're probably expecting me to get angry and react to that comment.
Being angry makes you happy, so I'll have no part of that.

>
I'll just note that Tom has been stuck in high rant mode for several
days now. I wonder what's triggered him. Did another crank arm fall
off?
Did Janet Yellen refuse his phone consultation? Did Trump pass him
over for a Cabinet position yet again?   ;-)

 
Poor little Frank, with Biden's inflation eating iunto his retirement
he finds himself not wanted at Youngstown. Too woke. The world changes
but not Krygowski. Socialism is out of fashion.

 
 
You may be mistaken.
 
In Mahoning county, 50636 voters or 44.9% voted for Ms Harris.  That's
slightly higher than Ohio overall but not by much.

>
Remember, despite the failed Democrat strategy to pretend that there is
such a thing as a popular vote it is the Democrats themselves who put into
effect the "winjner takes all" strategy.
>
So it is ELECTORAL votes that count now and not the "popular vote" that
Democrats are claiming was so close. Trump won by a full 25% of electoral
votes and now you're hearing the Democrats crying that we should eliminate
the electoral system and go with the "entirely Democratic" popular vote.
Remember that Adolf Hitler was elected with the popular vote which is

Nope, Hitler was appointed as Chancellor because his party was the
largest in the  Reichstag although not a majority. 

EXACTLY why our founding fathers preferred the electoral system -

More bull shit. The U.S. was originally "designed" to be a union of
states and the Electrical system was designed to give each state
election authority, in presidential and vice presidential elections,
based on their population.

--
Cheers,

John B.