Re: Helmet efficacy test

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:56:40 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 3/31/2025 12:39 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:

 
Actually I was talking to Mr. Krygowski.  It seems to me that his
standards for studies on flu shots are different to those for bike
helmets, and I was curious as to what had convinced him of the efficacy
and safety of flu shots.

>
As I said, there is nationwide, ~ whole population data indicating flu
vaccines have high effectiveness in preventing infection and/or
hospitalization. There is no such nationwide data for bike helmets, and
indeed nationwide data shows no apparent benefit. And there are serious
weaknesses in many or most helmet promoting studies.
>
But more important, in my mind, is that helmet promoters almost without
exception falsely portray simple bicycle rides as an important and
serious risk for serious brain injury. (By not promoting helmets for
pedestrians or motorists, they imply that cycling is a bigger risk.) Yet
any unbiased examination of TBI epidemiology shows that cycling is not
an unusual TBI risk. In fact, you're much more likely to get a serious
case of influenza than to suffer a serious TBI from riding a bike.
>

On every topic I can remember, save bike helmets and infrastructure,
Mr. Krygowski tells us to believe the annointed experts. 

>
:-)  Of course, your memory is limited!
>

For what it's worth I think Mr. Krygowski is closer to right than wrong
on the subject of bike helmets...

>
Thank you.

There is no right or wrong regarding Bbicycle helmets. There's only
opinions....

...and opinions are subjective by definition.

--
C'est bon
Soloman