Sujet : Re: Excuses, excuses
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 11. Apr 2024, 04:42:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <tcje1jde738g2h82irrm4f7iku86v25k8d@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:39:14 -0500, AMuzi <
am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 4/10/2024 1:54 AM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:18:54 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:51:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
Last I checked, there were
still over ten million miles bicycled between fatalities, and cycling
was much safer per mile than walking.
>
>
<LOL> Safer per mile is a ridiculously stupid statistic. I'll wager
that cycling is much safer *per mile* than mountain climbing, too.
>
But it justifies his arguments so perfectly.
But evening things up perhaps hour of use would be more accurate.
After all a cyclist roaring down the road at 15 MPH can hardly be
compared with an auto traveling, sat, 70-80 MPH or an old lady
waddling along at 4 MPH.
Just as aircraft accidents are measured at hour of use not MPH
Welcome back, Mr Slocumb.
Thank you. Been enjoying the pleasures of foreign lands.
-- Cheers,John B.