Re: Facebook Account

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:57:29 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 8/29/2024 3:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Wed Aug 28 14:01:00 2024 AMuzi  wrote:

On 8/28/2024 1:31 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Wed Aug 28 07:54:51 2024 John B.  wrote:

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:57:16 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
>

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:54:42 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

Dumbass, I never said that any company patented machines I designed.

>
I beg to differ.  You most certainly did claim that your employers
patented your machines under their company names.  See below:
>

On Wed Aug 21 17:36:39 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

(Aug 31, 2023)
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/YAgynT7Dw2I/m/R6lf39FEAgAJ>
"The companies I worked for registered and patented their products -
my inventions under their names."

>
Incidentally, you don't "register" a patent.  You "apply for" or "are
issued" a patent.  You "register" a trademark or copyright.  Nice
demonstration that you haven't had much involvement with trademarks,
copyrights and patents.

>
>
But a VAST amount of experience in telling lies :-)
--
Cheers,
>
John B.
>

>
>
>
>
John, stilol mad because I called you on your "important" job of being a crew chief of a bomber that was never active. It was used for photoreconisance? That's NOT A BOMBER is it?

>
I can't recall which aircraft but the vintage aircraft fans
document everything well, easily found.
>
B50 was it?
>
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/boeing-b-50-superfortress-us-air-forces-forgotten-bomber-208546
>
Note page headline 'forgotten bomber' which implies you are
not alone.
>
At any rate why ever would you doubt Mr Slocumb's word?  And
what difference would it make? sheesh your demons are really
alive today it seems,
>

>

 
 
Don't believe that. As a NUCLEAR deterent, the B47 was the online plane until the B52A. The B47 was initially flown and released to production at the same time. The B50 was nothing more than a B29 with larger motors and less reliability. The B52J is about to be released. Modified B52H's with commercial jet engines and entirely changed weapons systems. Long range nuclear drones. We also have hypersonic missles in space. I don't believe these to be nuclear but they can hit virtually any spot on the globe in minutes if the military wants everyone else to know.
 
Old airplane buffs take a lot for granted. They tend to have very poor memories. John as crew chief, if he had a memory anymore, could tell you that every flight had dozens of "write ups" indicating repairs necessary. The basic airframe was reliable. They were crap for photoreconasance since they didn't have the ceiling and any jet fighter of the time could run them down an blow them out of the air. Hell, Even an SR71 was shot down and they flew in near space. It was a vacuum outside of them. You couldn't bail out because it would take so long to get to a breathable atmosphere that you'd asphixiate.
 
 

>
So now you're saying B50 is indeed a bomber and you'll
concede Mr Slocumb crewed them but No True Scotsman would
take one over a B52 in a nuclear exchange.
>
Do I have that right?
>
p.s.
Regarding your SR71 Red Herring, no SR71 was ever shot down.
None. Zip. Nada.
>
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/even-4000-miles-could-not-take-down-sr-71-blackbird-207945
>
"Despite being targeted by over 4,000 enemy missiles, no
SR-71 was ever lost to hostile fire."

And what's probably even worse for Tommy's ego is that I was appointed
a crew chief on a RB-50 when we returned from the atomic tests at
Enewetak where the squadron received a real "pat on the head" for
flown every mission successfully.

While Tommy's, from his own admission, greatest aid to atomic war  was
carrying the tool bag for a competent technician working on airplanes
carrying conventional bombs :-)
.
--
Cheers,

John B.