Re: Commuter innovation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Commuter innovation
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 01. Apr 2024, 04:53:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uud7it$28r4g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/31/2024 6:28 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 3/29/2024 5:49 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
>
In my experience bike lanes are generally cleaner than roads which
themselves fairly well swept.
>
If you're talking about bike lanes sharing the same asphalt as adjacent
general purpose lanes, my experience is absolutely opposite. And
contrary to Mr. "sms," my experience seems common. For example:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=bike+lane+debris&t=newext&atb=v416-1&iax=images&ia=images
>
I don't see how it's possible to have more debris on the portion of road
where car tires pass at least occasionally. Each car tire rolls over at
least six inches of pavement, and at relatively high speed. Bits of
gravel or glass get thrown up and would eventually end up in an adjacent
bike lane simply by random chance, even if the car's wind blast didn't
add impetus.
>
 You snipped my explanation ie I was talking about all bike lanes/cycleways
ie the full on segregated stuff doesn’t get road debris spray. The ones
with wands yes I’m sure but it’s really not a thing, personally I notice
more the potholes on one road that even with 2in tires I don’t want to hit
the edge too hard, is some vegetation in the gutter on one cycle lane but
it’s hardly problematic.
I may be having trouble decoding that paragraph of yours. But: First, I'm not talking about completely separate paths away from roadways. Those are a minuscule portion of bicyclists' riding surfaces. Almost all riding is on streets or roads. And as others have pointed out, even completely separate paths often have debris problems.
I'm not sure if you're including typical "protected bike lanes" in your "full on separated" category or not. But the "protected" bike lane I've linked to before (near our city's downtown) is shunned by almost all cyclists in part because of its debris. The low concrete separators are apparently not able to stop gravel, etc. from being flung in from the road. And those separators do have gaps for driveway access.
As for "really not a thing," You seem to be ignoring the images linked above, and the images I've recently posted. I have other images as well, from longer ago, if you need to see them.
About potholes: Yes, they occur on roads. My area gets a lot of them, due in part to the local climate generating lots of freeze-thaw cycles. In a road, they are generally easy to see and avoid.
A problem in a bike lane can be avoided too, but often only by leaving the bike lane or avoiding it entirely, which is what I generally do. State law makes it clear that bike lanes are not mandatory.

 Other places that cross town centres can get glass or rubbish from night
life but it’s generally cleaned up quickly and hardly a bike lane only
thing.
Again, car tires naturally sweep small bits of gravel or glass off the roadway. When they do that, they end up in a shoulder or a bike lane, whichever is adjacent. Look at the photos again.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Mar 24 * Commuter innovation46AMuzi
27 Mar 24 `* Re: Commuter innovation45Frank Krygowski
27 Mar 24  +* Re: Commuter innovation3Catrike Ryder
27 Mar 24  i`* Re: Commuter innovation2AMuzi
27 Mar 24  i `- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
27 Mar 24  `* Re: Commuter innovation41Zen Cycle
28 Mar 24   +* Re: Commuter innovation15Frank Krygowski
28 Mar 24   i+* Re: Commuter innovation12Zen Cycle
28 Mar 24   ii+* Re: Commuter innovation7Frank Krygowski
29 Mar 24   iii`* Re: Commuter innovation6Zen Cycle
29 Mar 24   iii +* Re: Commuter innovation2Frank Krygowski
29 Mar 24   iii i`- Re: Commuter innovation1AMuzi
30 Mar 24   iii `* Re: Commuter innovation3Jeff Liebermann
30 Mar 24   iii  `* Re: Commuter innovation2AMuzi
30 Mar 24   iii   `- Re: Commuter innovation1Jeff Liebermann
29 Mar 24   ii`* Re: Commuter innovation4sms
29 Mar 24   ii +* Re: Commuter innovation2AMuzi
29 Mar 24   ii i`- Re: Commuter innovation1sms
29 Mar 24   ii `- Re: Commuter innovation1Frank Krygowski
29 Mar 24   i`* Re: Commuter innovation2Wolfgang Strobl
29 Mar 24   i `- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
29 Mar 24   `* Re: Commuter innovation25sms
29 Mar 24    `* Re: Commuter innovation24Zen Cycle
29 Mar 24     `* Re: Commuter innovation23Frank Krygowski
30 Mar 24      +- Re: Commuter innovation1AMuzi
30 Mar 24      +* Re: Commuter innovation20Frank Krygowski
30 Mar 24      i+- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
1 Apr 24      i`* Re: Commuter innovation18Frank Krygowski
1 Apr 24      i +- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
2 Apr 24      i `* Re: Commuter innovation16Frank Krygowski
2 Apr 24      i  +- Re: Commuter innovation1AMuzi
2 Apr 24      i  +* Re: Commuter innovation3Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 24      i  i+- Re: Commuter innovation1Rolf Mantel
3 Apr 24      i  i`- Re: Commuter innovation1Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 24      i  `* Re: Commuter innovation11Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24      i   +- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
4 Apr 24      i   +* Re: Commuter innovation6Zen Cycle
4 Apr 24      i   i`* Re: Commuter innovation5Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24      i   i +- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
4 Apr 24      i   i `* Re: Commuter innovation3Frank Krygowski
5 Apr 24      i   i  +- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
5 Apr 24      i   i  `- Re: Commuter innovation1Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24      i   `* Re: Commuter innovation3Zen Cycle
4 Apr 24      i    `* Re: Commuter innovation2Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24      i     `- Re: Commuter innovation1Catrike Ryder
1 Apr 24      `- Re: Commuter innovation1Zen Cycle

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal