Re: Cycling editorial

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Cycling editorial
De : mcleary08 (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Mark J cleary)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 12. Apr 2024, 21:53:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvc3gj$2hkh3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/11/2024 4:57 PM, AMuzi wrote:
"Whatever you like sucks. The bike I ride is best"
 https://bikerumor.com/op-ed-bike-industry-toxic-racing-culture/
 I found that needlessly divisive. YMMV.
I did not find it divisive as such but it points to snobbery. My guess is most bike in the world are used for utilitarian purposes. People need to get around cheap and they can be fast for some things. They type of riding I do only applies to a very small percentage of cyclist world wide I would also guess.
My road bike is great for what it does but if I was commuting to work or used it to run errands around town it would be horrible. In fact I avoid ever riding into town if I can avoid it because clipping and unclipping is a pain in the ass.
The other side of the story is the LBS around here at least one is quite a bit of snobbish folks. I never go in the place and it is all about Specialized bikes and sleek cycling clothing, and getting a tune up or work done is certainly available, I don't think they care where you come to them or not.
I do think go solid components are for any type of riding but frankly in 3rd world countries they just want something that has wheels and works.
Racing bikes is like those guitarist who are professionals and play entirely for a living. It is a who different world than the by are majority of guitarist who simply play a few chords and strum. As someone who played at one time guitars in the professional world and still would if I needed to, most products I need and service do not come from average music store. I need and use things that few strummers ever deal with.
--
Deacon Mark

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Apr 24 * Cycling editorial108AMuzi
12 Apr 24 +- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 +* Re: Cycling editorial56Frank Krygowski
12 Apr 24 i+* Re: Cycling editorial16Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Cycling editorial15Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii +* Re: Cycling editorial13Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii i`* Re: Cycling editorial12Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii i +* Re: Cycling editorial10AMuzi
12 Apr 24 ii i i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 ii i i`* Re: Cycling editorial8Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24 ii i i +* Re: Cycling editorial6Zen Cycle
18 Apr 24 ii i i i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 ii i i i`* Re: Cycling editorial4Jeff Liebermann
19 Apr 24 ii i i i +- Re: Cycling editorial1Frank Krygowski
23 Apr 24 ii i i i `* Re: Cycling editorial2Radey Shouman
23 Apr 24 ii i i i  `- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
19 Apr 24 ii i i `- Re: Cycling editorial1Ted Heise
19 Apr 24 ii i `- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 i`* Re: Cycling editorial38Frank Krygowski
19 Apr 24 i `* Re: Cycling editorial37Frank Krygowski
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Cycling editorial36Zen Cycle
19 Apr 24 i   +* Re: Cycling editorial3Frank Krygowski
24 Apr 24 i   i`* Re: Cycling editorial2Joy Beeson
24 Apr 24 i   i `- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
19 Apr 24 i   +* Re: Cycling editorial31AMuzi
19 Apr 24 i   i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
19 Apr 24 i   i`* Re: Cycling editorial29Frank Krygowski
21 Apr 24 i   i +- Re: Cycling editorial1Frank Krygowski
21 Apr 24 i   i `* Re: Cycling editorial27Wolfgang Strobl
21 Apr 24 i   i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
21 Apr 24 i   i  `* Re: Cycling editorial25Frank Krygowski
21 Apr 24 i   i   +* Re: Cycling editorial23zen cycle
21 Apr 24 i   i   i`* Re: Cycling editorial22Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i +* Re: Cycling editorial11AMuzi
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i+- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i`* Re: Cycling editorial9Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i `* Re: Cycling editorial8AMuzi
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i  `* Re: Cycling editorial6Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i   `* Re: Cycling editorial5Catrike Ryder
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i    `* Re: Cycling editorial4AMuzi
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i     `* Re: Cycling editorial3Catrike Ryder
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i      `* Re: Cycling editorial2AMuzi
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i       `- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
22 Apr 24 i   i   i `* Re: Cycling editorial10zen cycle
22 Apr 24 i   i   i  +* Re: Cycling editorial2AMuzi
22 Apr 24 i   i   i  i`- Re: Cycling editorial1Frank Krygowski
22 Apr 24 i   i   i  `* Re: Cycling editorial7Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i   `* Re: Cycling editorial6zen cycle
22 Apr 24 i   i   i    `* Re: Cycling editorial5Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i     `* Re: Cycling editorial4Zen Cycle
23 Apr 24 i   i   i      `* Re: Cycling editorial3Jeff Liebermann
23 Apr 24 i   i   i       `* Re: Cycling editorial2zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i   i   i        `- Re: Cycling editorial1Jeff Liebermann
23 Apr 24 i   i   `- Re: Cycling editorial1Joy Beeson
24 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Cycling editorial1Joy Beeson
12 Apr 24 +* Re: Cycling editorial20Zen Cycle
12 Apr 24 i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 i+* Re: Cycling editorial4Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Cycling editorial2Zen Cycle
19 Apr 24 iii`- Re: Cycling editorial1Zen Cycle
18 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
19 Apr 24 i`* Re: Cycling editorial14Zen Cycle
20 Apr 24 i `* Re: Cycling editorial13Frank Krygowski
20 Apr 24 i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Cycling editorial10Frank Krygowski
23 Apr 24 i   +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Cycling editorial8Jeff Liebermann
23 Apr 24 i    +- Re: Cycling editorial1Zen Cycle
24 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Cycling editorial4Frank Krygowski
24 Apr 24 i    i`* Re: Cycling editorial3Frank Krygowski
25 Apr 24 i    i +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
25 Apr 24 i    i `- Re: Cycling editorial1Jeff Liebermann
24 Apr 24 i    `* Re: Cycling editorial2Jeff Liebermann
24 Apr 24 i     `- Re: Cycling editorial1Zen Cycle
12 Apr 24 `* Re: Cycling editorial30Mark J cleary
18 Apr 24  `* Re: Cycling editorial29Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24   `* Re: Cycling editorial28Jeff Liebermann
18 Apr 24    `* Re: Cycling editorial27Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24     `* Re: Cycling editorial26Jeff Liebermann
20 Apr 24      `* Re: Cycling editorial25Frank Krygowski
20 Apr 24       +* Re: Cycling editorial17zen cycle
21 Apr 24       i+* Re: Cycling editorial15Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24       ii`* Re: Cycling editorial14Zen Cycle
6 Jun 24       ii `* Re: Cycling editorial13Jeff Liebermann
6 Jun 24       ii  `* Re: Cycling editorial12Zen Cycle
6 Jun 24       ii   +- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
6 Jun 24       ii   `* Re: Cycling editorial10Jeff Liebermann
6 Jun 24       ii    `* Re: Cycling editorial9Zen Cycle
6 Jun 24       ii     +- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
7 Jun 24       ii     `* Re: Cycling editorial7Rolf Mantel
7 Jun 24       ii      `* Re: Cycling editorial6Jeff Liebermann
7 Jun 24       ii       `* Re: Cycling editorial5Frank Krygowski
7 Jun 24       ii        `* Re: Cycling editorial4AMuzi
7 Jun 24       ii         +* Re: Cycling editorial2Frank Krygowski
7 Jun 24       ii         i`- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
7 Jun 24       ii         `- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
21 Apr 24       i`- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
22 Apr 24       `* Re: Cycling editorial7Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal