Re: Cycling editorial

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Cycling editorial
De : am (at) *nospam* yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 22. Apr 2024, 14:44:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Message-ID : <v05m2v$v1ul$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/21/2024 10:18 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:00:19 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
 
On 4/21/2024 4:54 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:24:56 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
I don't believe there's a rule against mounting a water bottle on the
bars. I could be wrong.
>
You're wrong:
<https://road.cc/content/news/49519-uci-sets-sights-drinking-bottles-next>
"The new rule Article 1.3.024 will only allow bottles to be positioned
on the down tube and seat tube."
>
<https://assets.ctfassets.net/761l7gh5x5an/7s1ma6mVAVlFwi8rRgy0Iw/1bef531dd9e9f534c34ff016c68e3c72/Clarification_Guide_of_the_UCI_Technical_Regulation_-_20211005_-_ENG.pdf>
See pages 49 to 51.
>
 
heh heh heh
>
Riders used to complain that the 'white sox only; must cover
the ankle' rule was silly. And also the official with a tape
measure checking distance between hem of shorts leg and knee
back during the 'black shorts only' rule era.
>
But as they say all is change. A new era with even more
arbitrary and ridiculous rules.
 In the interest of not starting a political discussion, I'll just
mention that the problem has been well known for many centuries and is
commonly known as the Chinese version of legalism:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalism_(Chinese_philosophy)>
Legalism can be made to work, but does not scale easily to large
numbers without using coersion.
 "Change everything"  (I have a rubber stamp with those words).
 
It's universal to bureaucracies as Hayek brilliantly explained.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Apr 24 * Cycling editorial108AMuzi
12 Apr 24 +- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 +* Re: Cycling editorial56Frank Krygowski
12 Apr 24 i+* Re: Cycling editorial16Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Cycling editorial15Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii +* Re: Cycling editorial13Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii i`* Re: Cycling editorial12Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 ii i +* Re: Cycling editorial10AMuzi
12 Apr 24 ii i i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 ii i i`* Re: Cycling editorial8Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24 ii i i +* Re: Cycling editorial6Zen Cycle
18 Apr 24 ii i i i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 ii i i i`* Re: Cycling editorial4Jeff Liebermann
19 Apr 24 ii i i i +- Re: Cycling editorial1Frank Krygowski
23 Apr 24 ii i i i `* Re: Cycling editorial2Radey Shouman
23 Apr 24 ii i i i  `- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
19 Apr 24 ii i i `- Re: Cycling editorial1Ted Heise
19 Apr 24 ii i `- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
12 Apr 24 i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 i`* Re: Cycling editorial38Frank Krygowski
19 Apr 24 i `* Re: Cycling editorial37Frank Krygowski
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Cycling editorial36Zen Cycle
19 Apr 24 i   +* Re: Cycling editorial3Frank Krygowski
24 Apr 24 i   i`* Re: Cycling editorial2Joy Beeson
24 Apr 24 i   i `- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
19 Apr 24 i   +* Re: Cycling editorial31AMuzi
19 Apr 24 i   i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
19 Apr 24 i   i`* Re: Cycling editorial29Frank Krygowski
21 Apr 24 i   i +- Re: Cycling editorial1Frank Krygowski
21 Apr 24 i   i `* Re: Cycling editorial27Wolfgang Strobl
21 Apr 24 i   i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
21 Apr 24 i   i  `* Re: Cycling editorial25Frank Krygowski
21 Apr 24 i   i   +* Re: Cycling editorial23zen cycle
21 Apr 24 i   i   i`* Re: Cycling editorial22Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i +* Re: Cycling editorial11AMuzi
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i+- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i`* Re: Cycling editorial9Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i `* Re: Cycling editorial8AMuzi
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i  `* Re: Cycling editorial6Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i i   `* Re: Cycling editorial5Catrike Ryder
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i    `* Re: Cycling editorial4AMuzi
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i     `* Re: Cycling editorial3Catrike Ryder
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i      `* Re: Cycling editorial2AMuzi
23 Apr 24 i   i   i i       `- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
22 Apr 24 i   i   i `* Re: Cycling editorial10zen cycle
22 Apr 24 i   i   i  +* Re: Cycling editorial2AMuzi
22 Apr 24 i   i   i  i`- Re: Cycling editorial1Frank Krygowski
22 Apr 24 i   i   i  `* Re: Cycling editorial7Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i   `* Re: Cycling editorial6zen cycle
22 Apr 24 i   i   i    `* Re: Cycling editorial5Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24 i   i   i     `* Re: Cycling editorial4Zen Cycle
23 Apr 24 i   i   i      `* Re: Cycling editorial3Jeff Liebermann
23 Apr 24 i   i   i       `* Re: Cycling editorial2zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i   i   i        `- Re: Cycling editorial1Jeff Liebermann
23 Apr 24 i   i   `- Re: Cycling editorial1Joy Beeson
24 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Cycling editorial1Joy Beeson
12 Apr 24 +* Re: Cycling editorial20Zen Cycle
12 Apr 24 i+- Re: Cycling editorial1Catrike Ryder
18 Apr 24 i+* Re: Cycling editorial4Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Cycling editorial2Zen Cycle
19 Apr 24 iii`- Re: Cycling editorial1Zen Cycle
18 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
19 Apr 24 i`* Re: Cycling editorial14Zen Cycle
20 Apr 24 i `* Re: Cycling editorial13Frank Krygowski
20 Apr 24 i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i  +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Cycling editorial10Frank Krygowski
23 Apr 24 i   +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
23 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Cycling editorial8Jeff Liebermann
23 Apr 24 i    +- Re: Cycling editorial1Zen Cycle
24 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Cycling editorial4Frank Krygowski
24 Apr 24 i    i`* Re: Cycling editorial3Frank Krygowski
25 Apr 24 i    i +- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
25 Apr 24 i    i `- Re: Cycling editorial1Jeff Liebermann
24 Apr 24 i    `* Re: Cycling editorial2Jeff Liebermann
24 Apr 24 i     `- Re: Cycling editorial1Zen Cycle
12 Apr 24 `* Re: Cycling editorial30Mark J cleary
18 Apr 24  `* Re: Cycling editorial29Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24   `* Re: Cycling editorial28Jeff Liebermann
18 Apr 24    `* Re: Cycling editorial27Frank Krygowski
18 Apr 24     `* Re: Cycling editorial26Jeff Liebermann
20 Apr 24      `* Re: Cycling editorial25Frank Krygowski
20 Apr 24       +* Re: Cycling editorial17zen cycle
21 Apr 24       i+* Re: Cycling editorial15Jeff Liebermann
22 Apr 24       ii`* Re: Cycling editorial14Zen Cycle
6 Jun 24       ii `* Re: Cycling editorial13Jeff Liebermann
6 Jun 24       ii  `* Re: Cycling editorial12Zen Cycle
6 Jun 24       ii   +- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
6 Jun 24       ii   `* Re: Cycling editorial10Jeff Liebermann
6 Jun 24       ii    `* Re: Cycling editorial9Zen Cycle
6 Jun 24       ii     +- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
7 Jun 24       ii     `* Re: Cycling editorial7Rolf Mantel
7 Jun 24       ii      `* Re: Cycling editorial6Jeff Liebermann
7 Jun 24       ii       `* Re: Cycling editorial5Frank Krygowski
7 Jun 24       ii        `* Re: Cycling editorial4AMuzi
7 Jun 24       ii         +* Re: Cycling editorial2Frank Krygowski
7 Jun 24       ii         i`- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
7 Jun 24       ii         `- Re: Cycling editorial1AMuzi
21 Apr 24       i`- Re: Cycling editorial1zen cycle
22 Apr 24       `* Re: Cycling editorial7Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal