Re: Narrow handlebars

On 4/29/2024 9:56 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 4/29/2024 4:54 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:16:48 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 4/29/2024 1:55 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:31:11 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

Your evidence, please?

>
That from a guy who never documented any of his brags.

>
Wrong, Mr. Tricycle Rider. In response to your "no documentation"
whining I did document some of my achievements. Then you whined "You're
posting that just to brag."

>
Sorry, but proclaiming that some unnamed people say that you know what
you're talking about is not documentation.
>

Go back to pretending you don't care what I post.

>
None of the following is documentation. All of it is undocumented
bragging

 IIRC, I've linked to a newspaper article by the editor of the regional newspaper, describing his ride to work under my instruction. I've linked documentation of my PE license. I've linked to detailed narration of my coast to coast tour. I don't what else I may have documented over the years, like several other news stories, bike related articles I've had published (including internationally), my photos in _Bicycling!_ magazine, etc. There's quite a lot to choose from.
 I can document much more, although the moment I do, you'll label it "just bragging." So it's really not worth the effort.
 Now please remind me what _you_ have documented. All I recall is a fuzzy photo of _some_ guy that you claimed showed your then-muscular legs decades ago! That was funny!
 As I said, you can return to pretending you don't care what I post. All while yapping at my online heels like a less intelligent chihuahua.
 

Frank, you're trying to rationalize with a willfully ignorant troll who reads DARPA and congressional reports detailing the military's acquisition and use of 80,000 AR-15s before it was re-numerated as the M16 and still claims 'the ar-15 was a weapon the military never wanted and never used'. He'll probably respond to this by writing no such report was ever posted in this forum.
He's also the troll who claims to have vast cycling experience outpacing either of us, yet claims there no such thing as 'taking the lane'.
And let's not forget how he read the federal Respect for Marriage act which states
"nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to diminish or abrogate a religious liberty or conscience protection otherwise available to an individual or organization under the Constitution of the United States or Federal law. "
and claims it means
"The bill clearly outlaws attempts to refuse services because of religious beliefs," (a direct quote from him https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/KjG6nUdy6iA/m/5ssw2fZnAAAJ)
IOW - you shouldn't worry about trying to defend yourself against a willfully ignorant idiot with a 4th grade reading comprehension - we all know his ability to rationally analyze facts are on par with the kunich.
--
Add xx to reply