Sujet : Re: Bicyclist decapitated
De : am (at) *nospam* yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 03. May 2024, 16:54:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Message-ID : <v12tqb$jifk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/3/2024 9:25 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2024 07:43:18 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
The IPCC has flooded the market for fantasy.
Not flooded, but getting there. Apparently AI is being used to create
fake papers that look reasonable.
"AI Writes Scientific Papers That Sound Great but Aren’t Accurate"
<https://time.com/6695917/chatgpt-ai-scientific-study/>
For a time, papers suitable for retraction were identified by the
number or percentage of retracted references and citations found at
the bottom of each paper. (Positive feedback). I haven't searched
for retracted papers involving the IPCC.
"Identifying Retracted Journal Articles"
<https://mclibrary.duke.edu/about/blog/identifying-retracted-journal-articles>
"This database currently contains over 47,000 retracted articles
tagged with reason(s) for retraction..."
"Nature News reported that more than 10,000 research papers were
retracted in 2023."
Yes, outright fraud and/or ineptitude (un reproduceable results) has become a plague among academic papers, some subset of which are them withdrawn. This is a widely noted problem and has resisted rectification. One of a few hundred current examples:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00716-2That said, in the field of theology of climate religion (aka The Greenies), no one planning for a career with government grants is ever going to rock that boat.
-- Andrew Muziam@yellowjersey.orgOpen every day since 1 April, 1971
Bicyclist decapitated
Re: Bicyclist decapitated