Re: Riding after heavy manual labor

On 5/29/2024 5:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 5/29/2024 3:33 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Tue May 28 16:40:25 2024 AMuzi  wrote:

On 5/28/2024 3:44 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Tue, 28 May 2024 19:36:46 GMT, Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
Is your "middle" step child a son or daughter?
>

The son was #2 born...

>
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/dJ8N0EjcWfc/m/ytSKYs7XAAAJ>
"My middle step-daughter has a master's in music and could play
concert piano."
>
Perhaps you would appear less confused if you drop the "middle"
designation and assign them names (or numbers) so that it's possible
to identify which is which.
>
>
OT Drivel:  So much for authoritative scientific papers.  Who are we
going to trust now?  Tom?
>
"Wiley shuts down 19 science journals and retracts 11,000 gobbledygook
papers"
<https://joannenova.com.au/2024/05/so-much-for-peer-review-wiley-shuts-down-19-science-journals-and-retracts-11000-fraudulent-or-gobblygook-papers/>
>
>

>
I saw that.
I've mentioned the plague of irreproducible results* in
modern science here for years. It's getting worse and the
numbers are staggering. Whether from incompetence or
outright fraud this cannot continue without a tragic ending.
>
*That catchy term is not my coinage:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/397286
-- Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>

>
>
>
>
I don't think that you can call it outright fraud. People with a degree like Liebermann who don't have the ability to return to first principles do misinterprit what they consider to be odd result from an experiment and build entire lunatic interpretations to them. The latest is "room temperature superconductors"
>
We know very well that superconductivity exists and there is an absolute FORTUNE in having a room temperature superconductor.
>
But we also know WHAT causes super conductivity and why room terperature superconductors are not possible.
>
So building test equipment that makes it appear to have such a thing could conceivably make its finders a fortune before discovery of the "error".
>
Now much greater skepticism of published papers finds them to be 50% or more absolutely wrong. When you think that a degree can be of worth to anyone that puts in the time and money you discover that an idiot will always be an idiot and peer review ONLY works if 1. The peer actually reviews the work and 2. He is smart enough to have been a fair reviewer.
>
I would like you to actually watch the garbage spread all over these pages of Usenet. Probably 98% of it is simply opinion and untrue. The other 2% is misunderstood fact for the most part and occassionally someone like Jobst or Jute comes along whose opinions are based on facts and proven interpretations and not opinions based on feelings based on nothing.
>
Liebermann cannot even remember that I have 3 step-daughters and one step-son and he is telling us I am wrong about things that I did and was paid for while he couldn't even find work? Krygowski believes that you can tell the difference between a 26.8 mm, a 27 mm and a 27.2 mm seat post requirement using a micrometer in a  welded STEEL frame?
>
Is it any wonder that you discover that only very few people can actually make use of a college education. Most especially in science. I read my way through three libraries to acquire the knowledge to BEGIN my education. Krygowski learned to teach future engineers by being a plant engineer? Hopefully the text books were good.

  "98% of it is simply opinion and untrue."
 Such as Harry Truman bashing an assassin with a pistol maybe?

Funny how tommy "read out" three libraries, yet never came across an account of the assassination attempt on Truman.