Re: RE: Re: Riding after heavy manual labor

On 5/31/2024 6:02 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Fri May 31 16:21:15 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 5/31/2024 10:40 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Fri May 31 05:12:24 2024 zen cycle wrote:

On 5/29/2024 5:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:

>

>
Such as Harry Truman bashing an assassin with a pistol maybe?

>
Funny how tommy "read out" three libraries, yet never came across an
account of the assassination attempt on Truman.

>
>
>
>
Of what use was a knowledge of politics for one headed for a career in
science?

>
First off, it's history, not politics, dumbass.
Second, It isn't necessary, but if you actually read out three
libraries, you would have come across an account of the Truman
assassination attempt. If you purposefully skipped the sections on the
library with history, politics, philosophy, or any other subject not
dedicated to the sciences, then you didn't actually read out any libraries.
>
(no, tommy, no one believes you did any extensive reading in any
libraries, let alone 'read them out').
>

You tell us that you have a degree in electronics engineering
and yet are incapable of programming.

>
No matter how many times you tell that lie, it will never become true.
I've done plenty of programming, I just find it to be slightly less
boring than watching paint dry and I'm admittedly not very good at it.
For that matter, you couldn't answer a simple question about the a/d
scaling in a program you allegedly wrote, and weren't even aware of the
commented section that described the a/d hardware until I pointed it
out. Just where did you steal that code from tommy? You very clearly
didn't write it.
>
>

One therefore infers that you
NEVER took a class in digital electronics which would demand a
knowledge of programming.

>
Only you would infer that, because you operate on a false first premise
(like you do with oh so many things)
>
So, stupid, first off a class in digital electronics doesn't demand a
knowledge of programming. Fundamental digital classes focus on discrete
gates, boolean (combinatorial) logic, and functional completeness. No
programming or understanding of programming languages is required.
>
https://pages.uoregon.edu/rayfrey/DigitalNotes.pdf
>
Programming for hardware equivalents isn't brought into the picture
until those fundamentals are understood, and yes, this is where VHDL is
introduced - to program combinatorial equivalents.
>
I've worked with plenty of programmers who have so little understanding
of hardware that they rely on an engineering tech to help them
troubleshoot their test beds.
>

>
I wish that just ONE of you three would be capable of telling the
truth, but you have shown that is a wish never to be fulfilled.
>

>
oh, the irony...."I was a senior business consultant"....lol

    There you have it from the expert. The Secret Service who did not protect the President as they did after Kennedy actually told you the truth. Just like they did with the Kennedy Assassination right? Now that it turns out that there WAS a gunman on the hill as was sworn to by MANY witnesses and there was AT LEAST one more who shot at Kennedy with a pistol since they found a .30 caliber pistol bullet on the floor of the car that Kennedy was in. When Lee Harvey Oswald was taken from the Book Depository he shouted to the reporters "I've been framed" How did Jack Ruby end up in that staircase in a police station with a gun?
 The real irony is that you are in such pain from not being the super successful EE that you will say absolutely anything and you couldn't care less whether it wzs true or not. So that is pretty much why you're nowhere as successful and you'd have liked to have been. Being nothing better than a paperwork wonk must really get to you considering I was being paid $233,000 a year at one job and more at others. And I had an entire conculting company renting my services out as one of their best embedded systems programmers.
 That's why I consulted for NASA and the Army. You on the other hand were fired from H-P because you believed that working overtime meant you were incompetent. So you couldn't finish your assignments.
 I really feel sorry for you three. All of you did so little with your lives and every bit of it was your own faults and you decry me for being ambitious and getting the job done.

There are a lot of facts and testimony which conflict with the Warren report but a .30 pistol round did not exist in 1963:
https://www.guns.com/news/2022/01/06/new-caliber-federal-30-super-carry
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971