Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 7/6/2024 10:59 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:We've discussed this at length. Before we could have any hope of numbers we can agree upon, we'd first have to have a rational discussion on the legitimate uses of firearms by members of the public.As I've said before, our constitution was groundbreaking. But it was never perfect, and in many ways it was and is faulty.What's rapid? A revolver?
>
Other nations were able to examine our constitution, note its faults and correct them when writing theirs. One common correction is not letting every whacko buy and use rapid fire weaponry designed for military use.
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzHG-ibZaKM
I can't think of anything on earth which hasn't been applied to military purposes (David, sling, 5 stones...)My phrase was clearly not condemning public use of _everything_ ever designed for military use. Read again and see.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.