Re: Disc brake maintenance tips

On 7/8/2024 8:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 7/7/2024 11:13 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 7/6/2024 10:59 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 7/6/2024 8:18 PM, John B. wrote:

>

In the real world of Canada, Britain, Ireland, Germany, Netherlands,
Spain, Australia, New Zealand, etc. etc. policies like that work very
very well.

>
That's only one of the reasons I wouldn't want to live in those
places.

>
And it might be noted that in none of the countries Frankie has named
does the country's basic laws (dated to 1789) include the right to
"keep and bear Arms"

>
Right. As I've said before, our constitution was groundbreaking. But it was never perfect, and in many ways it was and is faulty.
>
Other nations were able to examine our constitution, note its faults and correct them when writing theirs. One common correction is not letting every whacko buy and use rapid fire weaponry designed for military use.
>

>
What's rapid?  A revolver?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzHG-ibZaKM
>
I can't think of anything on earth which hasn't been applied to military purposes (David, sling, 5 stones...)

 there's a big difference between being designed for military use being "applied" and used for warfighting purposes.
 I know you know the difference, I also know you're deliberately deflecting the point.
 

>
>

 

No, I'm not. 'Military use' or 'purposeful military design' are not at all clear or helpful terms.  The best special forces sharpshooters use very expensive precision single shot bolt action rifles, not crappy 'spray and pray' automatics.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971