Sujet : Re: A Bicycle Safety Parable
De : am (at) *nospam* yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 21. Jul 2024, 16:20:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Message-ID : <v7j8vp$4j07$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/21/2024 3:19 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:11:58 +0200, Wolfgang Strobl
<news5@mystrobl.de> wrote:
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:46:53 -0400 schrieb Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org>:
>
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 13:19:02 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
On 7/20/2024 1:08 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
https://bicycledriving.com/law/a-bicycle-safety-parable
>
>
>
+1
I fought those fights against The Planners all my life. And
lost every time.
>
>
For what it's worth. I am opposed to any "bikeway" that is not
totally isolated from vehicular traffic and parked cars (bike lanes).
>
That is completely missing the point.
I thought one of the points was about disliking bike lanes.
I'm with Mr Strobl.
Dedicated (non-MV) recreational paths are different in kind from cyclist-eating traffic impediments, 'death chutes' and so on.
-- Andrew Muziam@yellowjersey.orgOpen every day since 1 April, 1971
…