Re: New Bike Path

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: New Bike Path
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 27. Jul 2024, 02:06:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v81dn4$31pcq$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/26/2024 3:33 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 7/26/2024 8:38 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
I'm just reporting on what actually happens, not what would happen in
some ideal world.
>
No your as ever using select information ie cherry picking, ie using
absolute numbers over the rate, Summit Street numbers of casualties have
gone up as has number using the bike lane.
>
Summit Street bike use increased about 75%, as I recall. Car-bike
crashes increased something like ten fold.
>
Crashes when from 6 to 19 this is such low and poor statistics, after all
wasn’t a death post construction low numbers like these really are iffy.
Nonsense! In the years prior to the installation, they had six car bike crashes in 37 months. Immediately afterward they had eleven car-bike crashes in 8 months. There is no chance of that NOT being statistically significant! To pretend otherwise is laughable.

That's irrelevant. The glorious, lobbied-for, heralded bike trap made
things much more dangerous for bicyclists.
>
I rather suspect any lobby group particularly in 2018 would have wanted a
protected bike lane not what they got!
You're completely ignoring the crash mechanisms. See below.

I’d also note that while called a protected
cycle route it’s largely absent ie mainly paint having a google maps ride
though, and channels one into the door zone!
>
In other words "What the lobbyists asked for and got is terrible!"
Another example of those ever-shifting goal posts.
>
No it clearly isn’t a protected cycleway for most of its length seems to
only be paint to call it protected is really overselling it, if not
deliberately misleading.
The crashes happened at intersections, where motorists were entering or exiting side streets. You can "protect" a bikeway by erecting ten foot tall concrete walls if you like; but there must still be gaps for side street access. Unless you believe in 100% grade separation, or perhaps flying cars.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jul 24 * New Bike Path98Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24 `* Re: New Bike Path97Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24  +* Re: New Bike Path94Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24  i`* Re: New Bike Path93Rolf Mantel
11 Jul 24  i +- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24  i +* Re: New Bike Path6Frank Krygowski
11 Jul 24  i i+* Re: New Bike Path2Frank Krygowski
11 Jul 24  i ii`- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24  i i`* Re: New Bike Path3Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24  i i `* Re: New Bike Path2Frank Krygowski
11 Jul 24  i i  `- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
11 Jul 24  i +* Re: New Bike Path5Frank Krygowski
13 Jul 24  i i+- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
13 Jul 24  i i`* Re: New Bike Path3Frank Krygowski
13 Jul 24  i i +- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
26 Jul 24  i i `- Re: New Bike Path1Frank Krygowski
12 Jul 24  i `* Re: New Bike Path80Rolf Mantel
12 Jul 24  i  +* Re: New Bike Path10Catrike Ryder
12 Jul 24  i  i`* Re: New Bike Path9Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jul 24  i  i `* Re: New Bike Path8Catrike Ryder
12 Jul 24  i  i  `* Roundabouts (was: Re: New Bike Path)7Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jul 24  i  i   +* Re: Roundabouts4Frank Krygowski
13 Jul 24  i  i   i`* Re: Roundabouts3Wolfgang Strobl
13 Jul 24  i  i   i +- Re: Roundabouts1AMuzi
13 Jul 24  i  i   i `- Re: Roundabouts1Frank Krygowski
13 Jul 24  i  i   `* Re: Roundabouts (was: Re: New Bike Path)2Ted Heise
13 Jul 24  i  i    `- Re: Roundabouts1zen cycle
13 Jul 24  i  +* Re: New Bike Path48zen cycle
13 Jul 24  i  i`* Re: New Bike Path47Frank Krygowski
13 Jul 24  i  i `* Re: New Bike Path46Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  +* Re: New Bike Path31John B.
14 Jul 24  i  i  i+* Re: New Bike Path4Frank Krygowski
14 Jul 24  i  i  ii`* Re: New Bike Path3Catrike Ryder
15 Jul 24  i  i  ii `* Re: New Bike Path2John B.
15 Jul 24  i  i  ii  `- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  i+* Re: New Bike Path24Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  ii+* Re: New Bike Path2John B.
14 Jul 24  i  i  iii`- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  ii+* Re: New Bike Path19Jeff Liebermann
14 Jul 24  i  i  iii+* Re: New Bike Path15Ted Heise
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii`* Re: New Bike Path14Jeff Liebermann
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii +* Re: New Bike Path11Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i`* Re: New Bike Path10Jeff Liebermann
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i +* Re: New Bike Path2Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i i`- Re: New Bike Path1Jeff Liebermann
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i `* Re: New Bike Path7Ted Heise
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i  +* Re: New Bike Path4AMuzi
15 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i  i`* Re: New Bike Path3Ted Heise
15 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i  i +- Re: New Bike Path1AMuzi
15 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i  i `- Re: New Bike Path1Zen Cycle
15 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i  `* Re: New Bike Path2Jeff Liebermann
15 Jul 24  i  i  iiii i   `- Re: New Bike Path1Ted Heise
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii `* Re: New Bike Path2AMuzi
14 Jul 24  i  i  iiii  `- Re: New Bike Path1Ted Heise
14 Jul 24  i  i  iii`* Re: New Bike Path3Catrike Ryder
14 Jul 24  i  i  iii `* Re: New Bike Path2Jeff Liebermann
14 Jul 24  i  i  iii  `- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
15 Jul 24  i  i  ii`* Re: New Bike Path2Frank Krygowski
15 Jul 24  i  i  ii `- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
15 Jul 24  i  i  i`* Re: New Bike Path2Rolf Mantel
15 Jul 24  i  i  i `- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
15 Jul 24  i  i  `* Re: New Bike Path14Rolf Mantel
15 Jul 24  i  i   +- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
15 Jul 24  i  i   `* Re: New Bike Path12Frank Krygowski
15 Jul 24  i  i    +- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
16 Jul 24  i  i    `* Re: New Bike Path10Frank Krygowski
17 Jul 24  i  i     +* Re: New Bike Path2Frank Krygowski
17 Jul 24  i  i     i`- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
17 Jul 24  i  i     +- Re: New Bike Path1Frank Krygowski
26 Jul 24  i  i     `* Re: New Bike Path6Frank Krygowski
27 Jul 24  i  i      `* Re: New Bike Path5Frank Krygowski
27 Jul 24  i  i       `* Re: New Bike Path4Catrike Ryder
27 Jul 24  i  i        +* Re: New Bike Path2Frank Krygowski
27 Jul 24  i  i        i`- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
27 Jul 24  i  i        `- Re: New Bike Path1Frank Krygowski
15 Jul 24  i  `* Re: New Bike Path21Rolf Mantel
15 Jul 24  i   `* Re: New Bike Path20Frank Krygowski
17 Jul 24  i    `* Re: New Bike Path19Catrike Ryder
18 Jul 24  i     +- Re: New Bike Path1zen cycle
18 Jul 24  i     `* Re: New Bike Path17Catrike Ryder
18 Jul 24  i      `* Re: New Bike Path16John B.
18 Jul 24  i       +* Re: New Bike Path11Frank Krygowski
18 Jul 24  i       i+* Re: New Bike Path4Catrike Ryder
19 Jul 24  i       ii+* Re: New Bike Path2John B.
19 Jul 24  i       iii`- Re: New Bike Path1Zen Cycle
19 Jul 24  i       ii`- Re: New Bike Path1John B.
18 Jul 24  i       i`* Re: New Bike Path6AMuzi
18 Jul 24  i       i +* Re: New Bike Path2Frank Krygowski
18 Jul 24  i       i i`- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder
19 Jul 24  i       i `* Re: New Bike Path3John B.
19 Jul 24  i       i  +- Re: New Bike Path1Frank Krygowski
19 Jul 24  i       i  `- Re: New Bike Path1Zen Cycle
19 Jul 24  i       `* Re: New Bike Path4John B.
20 Jul 24  i        `* Re: New Bike Path3John B.
21 Jul 24  i         `* Re: New Bike Path2John B.
21 Jul 24  i          `- Re: New Bike Path1John B.
11 Jul 24  `* Re: New Bike Path2Zen Cycle
11 Jul 24   `- Re: New Bike Path1Catrike Ryder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal