Sujet : Re: Some bicycle paths...
De : am (at) *nospam* yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 28. Jul 2024, 15:12:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Message-ID : <v85jl0$3uupi$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/28/2024 6:10 AM, zen cycle wrote:
On 7/27/2024 8:52 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 7/27/2024 6:19 AM, zen cycle wrote:
On 7/26/2024 3:09 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 7/26/2024 1:49 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 7/26/2024 9:14 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 7/25/2024 9:57 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 7/25/2024 3:27 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 7/25/2024 1:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>
Purposely irritating others is fun to people who are childish and obnoxious.
>
>
And yet, autos with political candidate stickers are common.
>
Interesting viewpoint. So expressing approval for a candidate in an election is childish and obnoxious? Really?
>
I see many more right wing examples than left wing examples. And when it comes to obscene examples, it's not even close.
>
>
>
"> I see many more right wing examples"
>
>
That's because you take offense at them and blithely disregard the left wing stickers. Perfectly normal response BTW, nothing wrong with that but see it as it is.
>
I know what confirmation bias is, thank you. I suppose this fine side point could be settled by actual counts. You know, data.
>
But the fundamental point is that candidate stickers are not necessarily intended to irritate others, as you implied. Most are intended to express support for a candidate, just as similar ones saying "Vote for the [police, or fire, school or library] levy."
>
And they've been ruled a first amendment right.
>
>
Excellent analysis.
Now just extend your argument one Amendment further...
>
ok. how about SCOTUS has repeated ruled the right to free speech is not absolute. Let's extend that to the 2nd amendment.
>
Personally I think they are wrong on both counts but that hasn't stopped them from either.
except when it comes to banning books in school libraries....You're fine with that, but you're not fine with banning guns in schools. Gee I wonder how many kids have died over the years from reading Catcher in the Rye?
You conflated limits on prurient materials to minor children in State funded facilities with 'book banning'. Utterly different things.
-- Andrew Muziam@yellowjersey.orgOpen every day since 1 April, 1971
…