Re: Fine Tuning Shifting

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Fine Tuning Shifting
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 15. Aug 2024, 02:25:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9jhtp$lbsl$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/14/2024 5:07 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 8/14/2024 3:35 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Aug 13 17:47:38 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:58:53 GMT, Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
I have a continuing problem with the shifting goin out of adustment. In one case the right shifter wire partially broke from my over- tightening it but in the other three cases I've had to mark it down to cable stretch which Andrew says doesn't exist. But the wires did not move and the shifting moved towards shifting into a faster gear. I can only assume that wire layup tightened up a little and showing those symptom.>
>
1.2mm galvanized cable (shifter cable):
120 kg  (265 lbs) min breaking load.
>
1.6mm galvanized cable (brake cable):
220kg (485 lbs ) min breaking load.
>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_load_limit>
I don't know the safety factor, but my guess(tm) is about 5 for the
brakes.  That puts the maximum load for the brake cable at:
    485 lb / 5 = 97 lbs
>
I don't know what you're using for a shifter or brake level.  The
mechanical advantage can't be much.  This covers brake lever
mechanical advantage, but not shifter:
<https://www.toolonpyora.fi/post/mysteries-of-the-cantilever-brake- what-about-the-brake-levers>
For brakes, my guess is no more than 37 lbs with a mechanical
advantage of about 6.  Therefore, with a strong grip, you might be
able to tension the cable to:
   6 * 37 lbs = 222 lbs
>
We lose grip strenth as we get older.  For 65+, the typical RH grip
strength is more like 21 lbs
<https://godsofgrip.com/pages/average-hand-grip-strength>
   6 * 21 lbs = 126 lbs
>
The shifters will be very different numbers, but I don't have enough
info handy to work those out.
>
Pulling on the brake cable with 126 - 222 lbs is more than the 97 lbs
required for the minimum breaking load.
>
<https://testbook.com/physics/stress-strain-curve>
-- Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558
>
>
>
>
What does galvanized wire have to do with anything? Campagnolo uses finer wire twisted more turns per inch. Shimano inners use thicker individual wires with fewer turns. You know note of this and make comments that have nothing whatsoever to do with it becayse you don't know anything about bicycles.
>
Shimano derailleurs have a higher spring tension and Campy has lower spring tension. So if you use Campy wires on a Shimano setup it will pull the wires tighter.
>
Andrew apparently missed this fact and that he was talking about crappy setup which you might consider correct IF you're using one Campy wires on Shimno. This was my problem with three or four adjustments to reach equilibrium. This was continually commented on by Krygowsky because he is a freewheel friction shifter who CANNOT HAVE THAT PROBLEM. But he can comment on things he knows nothing about. Sort of like Liebermann.
>
I am willing to believe that Flunky raced friction shifters but that his memory of that is so poor that he doesn't even remember how he did it. On the beginning of a YouTube video (about a race Lemond won) there was a HEADER showing a freewheel frcition setup going through the gears and there was perfectly distinct pauses between gears as the power was shut down. What was also distinct about that video was that racers did NOT follow as closely as they do now because of that large variation in power causing accelerations to be rather spotty.
>
I have had it with stupid asses that know nothing about the subject shooting their mouths off about it. Liebermann is the most coommon contributor to stupidity. Krygowski is easily the second. No other person in the world would pretend that it is stupid to wonder what meansurement system that Torx fittings are designed under. Krygowski is too dumb to know that you cannot have a standard without measuremnents. Questioning if those standards are English or Metric or either is beyond his ability to think.
>
Flunky just talks ahbout crap that he doesn't know about. Notice how he could not answer how you measure the length of a wire electronically? That's because he personally doesn't know how to use an oscilloscope. Which comes as no
 We do not see any functional difference between Campagnolo and Shimano brand gear wires (used in the appropriate lever of course).  We also use Campagnolo tandem (3 meters) gear wires on XL road bikes with Shimano equipment without any foibles or failures.
 In fact, gear wires in modern road systems with correct casing, ferrules and setup are notably reliable. The failures are nearly all at the lever, where the wire wraps on its capstan. This is not an issue with flat-bar levers BTW.
I'd like to take this moment to note that Tom is claiming that Andrew, Jeff, Funky and I are all mistaken on this (and almost every other!) point.
Yet somehow, it's _Tom_ that is continually narrating the countless problems he encounters and failures he generates. Problems and failures that seem puzzling only to him.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Aug 24 * Re: Fine Tuning Shifting74Jeff Liebermann
14 Aug 24 +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting72AMuzi
15 Aug 24 i+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting42zen cycle
15 Aug 24 ii+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting5Jeff Liebermann
15 Aug 24 iii`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting4Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 iii +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Jeff Liebermann
16 Aug 24 iii `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 iii  `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
15 Aug 24 ii+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting32Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 iii`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting31Zen Cycle
16 Aug 24 iii +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting10Frank Krygowski
16 Aug 24 iii i`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting9Catrike Ryder
16 Aug 24 iii i +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Catrike Ryder
16 Aug 24 iii i i`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
16 Aug 24 iii i +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 iii i i`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
16 Aug 24 iii i +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 iii i `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting3Jeff Liebermann
17 Aug 24 iii i  +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Jeff Liebermann
12 Sep 24 iii i  `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Tom Kunich
16 Aug 24 iii `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting20Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 iii  +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting7Jeff Liebermann
11 Sep 24 iii  i`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting6Zen Cycle
12 Sep 24 iii  i `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting5Tom Kunich
12 Sep 24 iii  i  +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
12 Sep 24 iii  i  +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2AMuzi
13 Sep 24 iii  i  i`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
13 Sep 24 iii  i  `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 iii  `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting12zen cycle
11 Sep 24 iii   `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting11Zen Cycle
12 Sep 24 iii    +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Tom Kunich
12 Sep 24 iii    `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting9Tom Kunich
12 Sep 24 iii     +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
12 Sep 24 iii     `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting7AMuzi
12 Sep 24 iii      `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting6Frank Krygowski
12 Sep 24 iii       `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting5AMuzi
12 Sep 24 iii        +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Catrike Ryder
13 Sep 24 iii        `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting3Frank Krygowski
13 Sep 24 iii         `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2AMuzi
13 Sep 24 iii          `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting4Jeff Liebermann
16 Aug 24 ii +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
16 Aug 24 ii `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 ii  `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
15 Aug 24 i+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting9zen cycle
15 Aug 24 ii+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 iii`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting5AMuzi
15 Aug 24 iii`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting4AMuzi
17 Aug 24 iii +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1AMuzi
17 Aug 24 iii +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 iii `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
16 Aug 24 ii`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1John B.
15 Aug 24 i+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting14Frank Krygowski
15 Aug 24 ii`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting13Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting11AMuzi
16 Aug 24 ii  +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Frank Krygowski
16 Aug 24 ii  +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting8Frank Krygowski
16 Aug 24 ii  i+- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Frank Krygowski
16 Aug 24 ii  i+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 ii  ii`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1zen cycle
16 Aug 24 ii  i`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting4Zen Cycle
17 Aug 24 ii  i +- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Frank Krygowski
17 Aug 24 ii  i `* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2zen cycle
11 Sep 24 ii  i  `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
16 Aug 24 ii  `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 i+* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 ii`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 i`* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting4AMuzi
15 Aug 24 i +* Re: Fine Tuning Shifting2Zen Cycle
15 Aug 24 i i`- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1AMuzi
15 Aug 24 i `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1AMuzi
15 Aug 24 `- Re: Fine Tuning Shifting1Zen Cycle

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal