Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:16:18 -0400, Frank KrygowskiYou've already lost. You spent money to buy the gun you were afraid you needed for "protection." That was the main part of your "stake," and that money is gone. You also spent time building your special Quick Draw McGraw holster down by your crotch. That time is gone. At least, since your riding is limited to almost perfectly flat bike paths, you don't lose much due to the weight of the gun.
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
ISTM that I'm betting I'll not need a gun. Over thousands and thousands<sigh> ...Strawman. A bet involves an ante or a stake. Something that
of trips, I've always been proven right.
>
Our Florida tricycle rider is, in effect, betting that he's going to
someday need a gun.
you lose if you lose the bet.
Seriously?? You bought tools to break your car's windows if you're trapped inside? Gawd! How paranoid!Sounds like in at least hundreds of trips, he's beenDoes the fact that we've never needed the window break tools we carry
consistently proven wrong.
in both vehicles prove that it's wrong to carry them?
And I've provided clear documentation of the data showing that those with guns in the home are more likely to be shot (although in your case, data shows your wife is more at risk); and data showing that bidirectional bike paths are much more dangerous for the wrong-way cyclists entering intersections.But still, he's afraid.That's from the guy that insists that my riding on bidirectional
sidepaths is dangerous and that my having a gun in my home (I have
four) puts me in danger of being shot.
...And he says that I'm fearful.You obviously are. Nobody else here has shared your fears.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.