Re: RE: Re: Artificiqal Intelligence

On 8/22/2024 11:00 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Aug 22 10:18:14 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 8/21/2024 7:13 PM, cyclintom wrote:

I know you're all expecting me to comment on Liebermann, Flunky or Krygowski, but I am simply going to tell you where it is used.
>
The thumbprint detector on your phone which makes up most consumer goods sold by price. Face recognician software widely used by the government. And voice recognition software used whereever they have enough computationaol power.
>
You all know that your thumbprint is lucky to be recognized one out of 20 times.

Mine works 19 out of 20 times the first try, when it doesn't it's usually an issue of sweaty fingers trying to open the app during a run or a ride. It's more likely you have it marginally set up, or maybe you're just using a cheap POS phone with a low-end display resolution. Tell ya what, mr "i made $14000 off my investments last month" (no, you didn't)....buy a better phone.

Face recognician is so reliable that it is not allowed as evidence in any courtroom in the US.

First off, it's Facial Recognition, not face recognician. And no, it wasn't a typo, you wrote it twice exactly the same way.
Facial recognition software is allowed as evidence in _every_ courtroom in the US, exactly the opposite of what you claim. This is why California is only now advancing legislation to limit the criminal justice system use of facial recognition under Assembly Bill 1814. Critics say it doesn't go far enough because it still allows facial recognition to be used as evidence.
https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2024/06/face-recognition-technology-california/

As for voice recognition I could not get it to work to properly understand "La Vuelra" once in dozens of tries this morning.

Maybe you should have tried it before you were drunk. Voice recognition works best when you aren't slurring your speech.
Of course, knowing you, what you were probably trying to find was "La Vuelta", but as usual you misspelled it and aren't bright enough to figure out how to enable the spell checker (Re: "Artificiqal"). And then it never occurred to you that you were trying to use a spanish phrase on a system set to understand American English.
dumb, dumb, dumb, tommy

The point is: even with sharply defined boundaries, AI is a failure. Elon Musk owns an AI company and knows how to propagadize to mmake it successful. There may very well be money to be made investing in it but you cannot have a database large enough to make real AI.

>
I'll give you some credibility on the issue when you can back up your
asinine claims with credible references. Learning how to spell
'artificial' would be a plus.
-- Add xx to reply
>

    Every day you insist on showing what a complete loser you are.

And everyday you insist on showing what a woefully misinformed idiot you are.
--
Add xx to reply